Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Revised-Another Brutal Rape of Norwegian Woman in Oslo

Added 4/12/12-
Six Afghans and one unidentified assailant were sentenced for a gang-rape a Swedish 29 year-old woman.

“They were clapping their hands and laughing and not one said no at any time,” she said during interrogation, according to the paper.

The heaviest sentence handed out to the criminals was 6 years. Does that mean that a rapist gets one year of jail for each accomplice of his?
I know that the Left in Sweden, like ours  is determined to run their country into the ground, but how could their law allow for such weak sentencing?

Original post below:

The above link contains details of a brutal rape and knife attack in Oslo. I have read dozens of accounts of these events that are becoming ever more frequent, but they don't get any easier to read. Media in nations such as these deliberately refrain from naming the Ethnic or cultural group of criminals but, considering the recent patterns and the fact that they threatened the victim in English (Not Norwegian), combined with the fact that almost every single rape case an ethnic Norwegian has been committed by a Muslim (or Muslims) in the past few years, I submit that it is more than likely that the attackers were those who, we are told, bring "Cultural Enrichment" to European nations.

The overwhelming amount (Almost 100%) of sexual crimes in nations such as Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, with a highly disproportionate amount in France, The Netherlands, Germany, and Britain, are being committed by Muslim men. Indigenous European (Notice that Europeans never get to be indigenous and by extension have rights?) young women and girls constitute the overwhelming number of victims of these crimes. So, if you have not guessed by this point, there is a wave of sexual assaults in these nations and very few victims are Muslim women and almost none of the rapists are Indigenous European males.

As I have noted in other posts, Islam is a socio-political system in addition to a religion. This system codifies the constant state of warfare between those of the House of Islam and those of the House of War, which is everyone who is not a Muslim or at least subjugated by Islamic rule.

This system makes the taking of sex slaves and the use of  females from conquered peoples for sex a perfectly acceptable thing.

"And all married women are forbidden unto you save those captives whom your right hand possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. (Muhammad Pickthall's English translation of the Quran)."

Note that the fact that these women may be married has no bearing on the Muslims. If they are taken in war then they are fair game. The link has many more quotes, by the way.

Leftist apologists for Islam will be quick to point out that other cultures did the same thing. Well, that was a long time ago for other cultures. The last time that slavery in Western Culture existed was before 1865, Europe having abolished it earlier. The closest parallel to a European people taking slaves of their nearby enemies in the same manner as the Koran (Written in the 7th century AD and still in force today), directs and allows for Muslims, can be found in the Iliad, which records events before 1200BC. Before the Age of colonization, Medieval Europe had virtually eliminated slavery by the the beginning of the 11th Century AD. Note also that slavery, although finally officially dropped by the last nation to allow it, Mauritania, is still practiced in this and other nations. They just call it different things.

One thing, among many, that Western students have had withheld from them, is the Islamic custom of three days of pillage following the successful conquest of a city. Islam provides this tradition for the weary and exhausted fighters in the service of Allah. Not that the Islamic conquests or their rule is presented in schools in anything other than good terms in the first place, indeed, the Christian Kingdoms of Spain are depicted in a bad light for daring to retake their land in the Reconquista. The customary three days of pillage, though, is a really juicy detail about which our children are not told. They may learn about the Ottoman Empire, and in doing so the fall of Constantinople must be briefly covered, but the atrocities suffered by its inhabitants in 1453 AD* will never be made known. Leftists, despising free nations or peoples, go to great lengths to extol the virtues of the Ottomans and their Empire. It is held up as a shining example of tolerant rule of many different peoples. They ignore the systematic taking of Christian boys to be raised as Muslim slave-soldiers (Janissaries) and Christian girls for the harems. They also ignore what happened once the defense of the city collapsed and Muslim soldiers burst into the city founded by Constantine over a thousand years earlier:

(*That's what happens when no proofreader is around. I never caught my typo. 1053, which was first typed into that spot, also happens to be a year that had importance for both the Eastern and Western Churches- the excommunicated each other. I was re-reading the post and realized that typed in a year for the Fall of Constantinople was 400 years off.)

"Commencing the last assault Sultan Mehmed II promised his troops three days of unbridled pillage of the city. Having stormed into Constantinople the Osmanli Turks used every moment to satisfy their instincts. In the rage of the battle with taking no notice of people they slaughtered everyone they met, and blood ran in torrents in the streets. The sackage broke out: the Turks rushed to the Palace of Blachernae and hastily took all the valuable assets out. Someone ran to Chora Churches and brought the precious shrine – the icon of Virgin Hodegetria, it was said to have been painted by Luke the Evangelist. The Turks ripped the riza off and cut the icon into four pieces[1]. They dragged praying women and children by hair out of the churches and beslaved them. They raped nuns and murdered men on the spot. "

"As soon as the Turks broke into the city they began to seize and enslave anyone who came their way. Anyone who resisted was slaughtered by the edge of the sword, and heaps of bodies covered the ground. “There were unprecedented events: all sorts of lamentations, countless rows of slaves consisting of noble ladies, virgins and nuns, who were being dragged by the Turks.46 In his zeal for Allah, Mehmet had ordered that the city, since it had resisted, be looted for the traditional three days according to Islamic law. But before the first day was up the Sultan brought in his police and put an end to the looting. The loss of the city for the Greeks meant not only an end of empire, but it also marked the start of almost four hundred years of captivity. For Mehmet it was the beginning of Ottoman rule, which would last until the 19th century. Under the rule of future Sultans the Ottoman Empire would continue conquering Christian lands, right up to the gates of Vienna in Austria. "

Note that in this case the three days were reduced to one.

My personal belief is that, far from being an issue of Muslim men not knowing how to control themselves among women who dress in a Western manner, as is advanced by Muslim apologists and Leftist Feminists*, the attitude of these attackers is fully in accordance with the concept of Jihad. The opportunity for booty in the conquest conquest of non-Muslim nations has been an integral part of Islamic warfare since its inception. Below is a quote that illustrates that this was no distortion of Islamic though but was encouraged by Mohamed himself:

"Amr's great distinction is that he was made military commander direct by the Prophet. In appointing him Mohammed said, "I am sending you forth as commander of a troop. May God keep you safe and give you much booty." When Amr answered, "I did not become a Muslim for the sake of wealth, but for the sake of submission to God," the Prophet rejoined, "Honest wealth is good for an honest man"-- a maxim which Amr doubtless remembered.... (page 202)" (Sources below)"honest+wealth+is+good+for+an+honest+man"&source=bl&ots=K8EneSVPgf&sig=PWgW12GwsUOuEVlIpbXIfwjMc

*"When University of Oslo Professor Unni Wikan reported a few daysbefore 9/11 that 65% of rapes in Norway were committed by Muslim men, she saw fit to add that“Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for theserapes” because Muslim men found Western dress too provocative to stand:" (Source Below)

The above quote by Ms. Wikan, a Leftist University professor in Norway, has got to be the worst piece of garbage that I have ever known to be spewed from any person's mouth. It is noteworthy that the greatest enemies of Ethnic Norwegian (And often those of other nations) women are Leftists of their own ethnic group.

The attitude of plunder has never left Islamic thought. The seizure of property, and especially the women, of conquered non-Muslim enemies still motivates the Muslim mind. I submit that, as much of the Muslim population of Europe has made no secret that they have every intention of eventually taking control of Europe and instituting what Jewish writer Bat Ye'or refers to as Eurabia, a significant portion of Muslim men must feel as if they are in the middle of the conquest right now. If that is the case, then they would likely reason that they are currently in the process of an extended version of the three days of pillage. Robberies, rapes, and other violent crimes against Ethnic Europeans are increasing. The police of these nations feel as if they are held back from doing their jobs, and it does not help when ethnic European men, probably due to concerns about being arrested themselves, fail to step up and defend their women:

"30 guests in a Swedish public bath watched as a 17-year-old girl was raped recently, and nobody did anything. The girl was first approached by 16-year-old boy. He and his friends followed her as she walked away to the grotto, and inside the grotto he got her blocked in the corner, ripped off her bikini and raped her, while his friend held her firm." (Source below)

....and it is beginning in the US:

I know that I have beaten this subject to death, but few will ever become aware of what is going on if the truth is not told. Last is long list of quotes concerning Muslim attitudes towards rape:

From the link below. All Italics and bolding are mine.

It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,says Hamid[link is in Swedish]. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably fucked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.” It was no coincidence that it was a Swedish girl that was gang raped in Rissne – this becomes obvious from the discussion with Ali, Hamid, Abdallah and Richard. All four have disparaging views on Swedish girls, and think this attitude is common among young men with immigrant background. “It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore…… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “Many immigrant boys have Swedish girlfriends when they are teenagers. But when they get married, they get a proper woman from their own culture who has never been with a boy. That’s what I am going to do. I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get fucked to pieces.”

The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations are so extremely high that it is difficult to view them only as random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his slave girls/concubines. This is perfectly allowed, both in the sunna and in the Koran. If you postulate that many of the Muslims in Europe view themselves as a conquering army and that European women are simply war booty, it all makes perfect sense and is in full accordance with Islamic law. Western women are not so much regarded by most Muslims as individuals, but as "their women," the women who "belong" to hostile Infidels. They are booty, to be taken, just as the land of the Infidels someday will drop, it is believed, into Muslim hands. This is not mere crime, but ideologically-justified crime or rather, in Muslim eyes, attacks on Infidels scarcely qualify as crime. Western women are cheap and offensive. We Muslims are here, here to stay, and we have a right to take advantage of this situation. It is our view of the matter that should prevail. Western goods, like the land on which we now live, belong to Allah and to the best of men -- his Believers. Western women, too, essentially belong to us -- our future booty. No wonder there is a deep and increasing suspicion against Muslims in the Swedish and European public.

French filmmaker Pierre Rehov states that: “A friend of mine is a retired chief of police, who used to be in charge of the security of a major city in the south of France. He reported to me that his men had to face an average of 10 rapes a week, 80% made by Muslim young men. 30% being what we call, in French, a ‘tournante,’ meaning that the victim is being raped by an entire gang, one after the other, often during an entire night. He was astonished that, in most cases, the parents not only would back up their rapist children, but also would not even understand why they would be arrested. There is an instant shift in the notion of good and evil as a major component of culture. The only evil those parents would see, genuinely, is the temptation that the male children had to face. Since in most cases the victims were not Muslims, the parents’ answer and rejection was even more genuine: how could their boys be guilty of anything, when normally answering to a provocation by occidental women, known for their unacceptable behavior?”

Sheik Taj Din al-Hilaly, who called himself the Grand Mufti of Australia and New Zealand, in a sermon compared unveiled women to uncovered meat: “If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park, or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, then whose fault will it be, the cats, or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the disaster. If the meat was covered the cats wouldn’t roam around it.” Abduljalil Sajid of the Muslim Council of Britain defended Hilaly as “a great scholar.”

Shahid Mehdi, an Islamic mufti in Copenhagen, Denmark, stated in 2005 in a televised interview that women who do not wear headscarves are “asking for rape,” so Hilaly is not an isolated case. According to Tanveer Ahmed, a Sydney-based psychiatrist, the attitude “comes from households, where young Muslims get the message that white girls are different, and that women in general are a corrupting influence.” There have been several brutal gang rapes of white women by Muslim immigrant men in Australia.

What makes this even more absurd is that in Norway, as throughout the Western world, white-on-non-white violence is exceedingly rare. The vast majority of racism and racist violence comes from non-whites against whites, or between different groups of non-whites. In Oslo, young girls are raped; schoolchildren are threatened with death, robbed and assaulted. The police have warned against “an alarming rise in street violence” in urban areas across the country. This is directly caused by mass immigration, which is nevertheless still championed by the very same media who attacked these two ambulance drivers.

For instance, a 17-year-old Somalian was convicted of the rape of a young girl in Oslo. The court stated that the rape was unusually brutal and lasted for several hours. The man choked the girl for so long that the medical doctor who examined her said that she could have died. The girl suffers from severe psychological problems in the aftermath of the attack. The African youth was sentenced to four and half years in prison. This sentence included another rape, where his Norwegian-Moroccan friend raped a 13-year-old girl whilst the Somalian helped to threaten her and keep guard. She has naturally been traumatized from the incident."

1 comment: