Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Princeton Student Blasts White Privilege Brainwashing

-Previous posts on White Privilege at bottom.


In a world of hate, lies, and truly Orwellian guilt-laying, one courageous student speaks out and is met with nothing more than recycled lies.

[5/1/14 - I should add that the Left has set this argument up to mean whatever they want.You either admit to being the beneficiary of White Privilege or you, by dint of being white, don't know that you benefit from White privilege. This of course begs the questions - How can anyone that is white even know if there is in fact such a thing as White Privilege? If being white makes it impossible to know of it , then couldn't those whites who supposedly do know also possibly be-wrong?]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/04/30/going-viral-princeton-university-students-bold-response-after-allegedly-being-told-repeatedly-to-check-your-privilege/

"Tal Fortgang, a freshman at Princeton University, says he has been ordered to “check your privilege” by his “moral superiors” several times this year because he happens to be a white male. In a column in the Princeton Tory, Fortgang takes on the ideology he says ”assumes that simply because I belong to a certain ethnic group I should be judged collectively with it.”

“There is a phrase that floats around college campuses, Princeton being no exception, that threatens to strike down opinions without regard for their merits, but rather solely on the basis of the person that voiced them. ‘Check your privilege,’ the saying goes, and I have been reprimanded by it several times this year,” the student writes. “The phrase, handed down by my moral superiors, descends recklessly, like an Obama-sanctioned drone, and aims laser-like at my pinkish-peach complexion, my maleness, and the nerve I displayed in offering an opinion rooted in a personal Weltanschauung.
[Worldview]

“‘Check your privilege,’ they tell me in a command that teeters between an imposition to actually explore how I got where I am, and a reminder that I ought to feel personally apologetic because white males seem to pull most of the strings in the world,” he continues.
Fortgang then explores his family’s history to figure out where his “privilege” comes from:

'Perhaps it’s the privilege my grandfather and his brother had to flee their home as teenagers when the Nazis invaded Poland, leaving their mother and five younger siblings behind, running and running until they reached a Displaced Persons camp in Siberia, where they would do years of hard labor in the bitter cold until World War II ended. Maybe it was the privilege my grandfather had of taking on the local Rabbi’s work in that DP camp, telling him that the spiritual leader shouldn’t do hard work, but should save his energy to pass Jewish tradition along to those who might survive. Perhaps it was the privilege my great-grandmother and those five great-aunts and uncles I never knew had of being shot into an open grave outside their hometown. Maybe that’s my privilege.

Or maybe it’s the privilege my grandmother had of spending weeks upon weeks on a death march through Polish forests in subzero temperatures, one of just a handful to survive, only to be put in Bergen-Belsen concentration camp where she would have died but for the Allied forces who liberated her and helped her regain her health when her weight dwindled to barely 80 pounds.

Perhaps my privilege is that those two resilient individuals came to America with no money and no English, obtained citizenship, learned the language and met each other; that my grandfather started a humble wicker basket business with nothing but long hours, an idea, and an iron will—to paraphrase the man I never met: “I escaped Hitler. Some business troubles are going to ruin me?” Maybe my privilege is that they worked hard enough to raise four children, and to send them to Jewish day school and eventually City College.

Perhaps it was my privilege that my own father worked hard enough in City College to earn a spot at a top graduate school, got a good job, and for 25 years got up well before the crack of dawn, sacrificing precious time he wanted to spend with those he valued most—his wife and kids—to earn that living.........Now would you say that we’ve been really privileged? That our success has been gift-wrapped?'

The real problem with the notion of automatic “privilege,” he explains, is you have no idea what their struggles have really been or “what they may have gone through to be where they are.”..........

“I have checked my privilege. And I apologize for nothing,” he concludes........


His column has received both praise and criticism. One commenter told Fortgang that as a “white male, you are most likely ignorant of the ingrained racism or sexism that lives in society today.”

“You want to play oppression olympics? What about the millions of blacks enslaved in America for 300 years, who then had to deal with segregation and Jim Crow while new immigrants were allowed to assimilate into white culture within one or 2 generations,” another wrote......."
------------------------------------------------------------------

"White Privilege" Video Aired by U. of Minnesota-Duluth

Hat tip to The Blaze.

White privilege is a concept similar to that of Obama's old favorite "Critical Race Theory". Along with college courses in "Whiteness Studies", these ideas are advanced with the intention of keeping the fires of racism alive in our minds. The ultimate goal is to keep whites both in a state of perpetual "White guilt" and to keep them on the defensive at all times. Colleges around the nation have been pushing this agenda for quite some time. The University of Delaware recently made Whiteness Studies mandatory for all students. There, whites have to endure all sorts of abuse and accusations from fellow students while the professors smugly demonize all cultures and societies created by whites.

What one is supposed to believe is that, no matter how far we have come, whites are born into a privileged state even today. This can only be remedied by subjecting them to a state of bondage in which they would be required to keep their mouths shut and acquiesce to whatever demands are made, be it more affirmative action, dumbed-down curriculums and standardized testing (For schools and for jobs), higher taxes to pay for more programs, rabid historical revisionism that paints the worst possible picture of any notable whites, what have you.

On a playing field in which White Privilege has been put forth as an assumed truth, whites are not to be allowed to complain about anything let alone make any complaints about how they believe that they are being treated. To paraphrase the advocates of White Privilege - "You have nothing to complain about. You're white, therefore, you can only be the beneficiary of the racist system that was created by the nation's founders. You need to accept any and all changes that we want. Only when we decide that your position is no longer one of privilege will you have the right to speak your mind. Until then, you need to be brushed aside and do what we tell you to do."


-From the above link:

"The University of Minnesota – Duluth (UMD) is now sponsoring an ad-campaign designed to achieve “racial justice” by raising awareness of “white privilege.”


The project disseminates its message, that “society was setup for us [whites]“ and as such is ”unfair,” through an aggressive campaign of online videos, billboards, and lectures. The ads feature a number of Caucasians confessing their guilt for the supposed “privilege” that comes along with their fair features.[...]

“You give me better jobs, better pay, better treatment, and a better chance – all because of the color of my skin,” reads one poster that features a close shot of a Caucasian male.

The Un-Fair campaign also held a series of lectures and events on campus last semester. One included a presentation by Tim Wise, author of Dear White America. In his book, Wise confesses a “longstanding fantasy” where he turns to a man with a “God Bless the USA” button and asks him, “why can’t you just get over it?”

"For all y’all rich folks, enjoy that champagne, or whatever fancy ass Scotch you drink.

And for y’all a bit lower on the economic scale, enjoy your Pabst Blue Ribbon, …

Whatever the case, and whatever your economic station, know this . . .

You need to drink up.

And quickly.

And heavily.

Because your time is limited.[...]

And in the pantheon of American history, old white people have pretty much always been the bad guys, the keepers of the hegemonic and reactionary flame, the folks unwilling to share the category of American with others on equal terms.

Fine, keep it up. It doesn’t matter.

Because you’re on the endangered list.

And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving."


The video can also be accessed on the linked article.

The ad is the brainchild of Tim Wise, a longtime "anti-White" white person. Along with other (this time) volunteer modern-day Sonderkommandos wearing inscribed anti-white messages on their faces while speaking about how wrongfully privileged whites are, Wise intends both to frighten whites into perpetual subservience and silence and to whip non-whites into an anti-white frenzy of jealousy and hatred. The white volunteers who shamelessly attack other whites make this ad all the more appalling.

This ad comes amid a slew of claims from others essentially stating that anything that is challenged by whites or conservatives is racism. Here are three examples from the past two days:




We have been faced with this agenda for a long time, but the campaign has been strongly stepped up of late. I personally believe that the new offensive is occurring now due to the difficulties that the Obama campaign is experiencing. 

In a typical "Year Zero" mentality, nothing honorable or good for humanity that was accomplished by whites is mentioned or allowed into the conversation. The ban on the global slave trade (Although blacks are still enslaved in more than one region in Africa), an horrific civil war fought almost entirely about slavery (Sorry, but the historical evidence is too strong to deny that one), the fact that mainly white Church bodies were almost the only groups condemning slavery, the desegregation of the American South, the acceptance of vast amounts of refugees from third-world nations, or any other virtuous action can not be entered into the debate. 

One's work ethic, the willingness to postpone life decisions such as marriage and children, frugality in spending in order to at some point accumulate any property, or moral compass can not be cited in defense of what you have or are working to have. You have (or will obtain) what you have exclusively by virtue of your aristocratic white birth, and nothing else.

We must fight back with the truth, and in a determined fashion. I for one worked too hard, at too many backbreaking jobs, and put off too many purchases to be fooled into feeling guilty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://thehotgates480bc.blogspot.com/2013/03/colorado-u-holds-white-privilege.html

Colorado U. Hosts White Privilege Conference

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/13/university-to-hold-controversial-white-privilege-conference-to-teach-about-unfair-invisible-system-of-privilege/

White students are being trained to hate everything about themselves, other whites, the society that bred them, and the history and civilization that gave birth to this country.

I have noted on previous posts (Two are below) that colleges in the US have been more than largely taken over by radical Leftists, particularly of the brand that specifically detests Western Civilization. Students are either forced to take, or are given handouts of college credits for attending, classes in "Whiteness' or "White Privilege  studies. These are geared primarily towards turning American whites into Sonderkomanndos who are tasked with dismantling everything that concerns our cultural and historical legacy.

A white never earns his or her credibility, education, job, or anything else; all of these are the fruits of an unfair system that bestows privileges solely on account of one's birth.

The United States is not a Western nation, except when it is, at which point it is evil because precisely due to the fact that it is a Western nation.

-From the top-linked article:

"The University of Colorado-Colorado Springs (UCCS) is offering students up to four college credits if they attend the public university’s 14th annual “White Privilege Conference,” Campus Reform reports..........

“I am privileged,” reads black text on an all white background. “I can if I wish arrange to be around people of my race most of the time.”

The video continues:

“I can go shopping fairly assured I won’t be followed or harassed.”

“When I’m told about our national heritage or about ‘civilization’ I am shows that people of my color made it what it is.”

[…]

“I can, whether I use checks, credit cards or cash, count on my skin color not to work against my appearing financially reliable.”

“I don’t have to educate my children to be aware of systemic racism for their own daily protection.”

[...]

“I can choose blemish cover or bandages in ‘flesh’ color and have them more or less match my skin.”

“I cannot be blind to the invisible system of privilege I am a part of,” the video concludes........"


Continuing to ignore what is going on will have one result- The electorate of the US will tilt irrevocably towards the anti-US and Leftist camp. National elections will no longer even be a contest, for too many voters will have been brainwashed to hate themselves and be overwhelmed by "white guilt". This guilt will be manifested in the election of more candidates who will assuage the self-hatred by having them accept increasing degrees of marginalization, more control, and crushing taxation to pay for more reeducation.

A culture that has protected the rights of free speech/press, self-defense, religion, property, trial by jury, the individual, true representative government, and changed to protect women and the oppressed (And even prior to this women enjoyed far better conditions than elsewhere) is the bad culture. World cultures such as those of Islamic societies and China that still deny or severely restrict these rights are the good ones.

As I noted a few days ago, Texas is experiencing a flood of similar reeducation at the primary school level:


....and the Lone Star State is in danger of having its crucial electoral votes go the wrong way:



Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Follow-Up To Paul Weston Arrest - Call for Civil Disobedience

This is a follow- up to the arrest of British patriot and activist Paul Weston, who in the land of Magna Carta and John Wilkes was charged with racism for uttering a quote by Winston Churchill on Islam (at bottom).

http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/04/bill-warner-on-the-arrest-of-paul-weston/

Bill Warner, of the Center for the Study of Political Islam, notes in a video (above - very short) that there is only one option to put a stop to the destruction of Free Speech (particularly when it is accurate) in the UK that is soon to come in the US. He makes his point clear - if hundreds of people gather together in public and make the same quote as did Mr. Weston, the police and the courts would be so bogged down in the prosecutions that the system would break down. He also notes that we need to stop doing all of our work "on the keyboard" and start actually doing something.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://thehotgates480bc.blogspot.com/2014/04/no-free-speech-in-uk-man-arrested-for.html


No Free Speech in UK - Man Arrested for Quoting Churchill on Islam

This is yet another example of what has happened to the nation that gave us both (In American English-"The") Magna Carta and the principles of the Whig Party:

http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/04/paul-weston-busted-for-quoting-churchill/

"........At around 2pm Mr Weston was standing on the steps of Winchester Guildhall, addressing the passers-by in the street with a megaphone. He quoted the following excerpt about Islam from the book The River War by Winston Churchill:

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property — either as a child, a wife, or a concubine — must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.”

Reportedly a woman came out of the Guildhall and asked Mr Weston if he had theauthorisation
 [Italics are mine and it's British spelling] to make this speech. When he answered that he didn’t, she told him “It’s disgusting!” and then called the police.

Six or seven officers arrived. They talked with the people standing nearby, asking questions about what had happened. The police had a long discussion with Mr Weston, lasting about 40 minutes.

At about 3pm he was arrested. They searched him, put him in a police van and took him away."
This is an absolute disgrace I can't believe that so many of us who live in the Anglosphere are doing nothing while the most free nations ever to exist are steadily being transformed into totalitarian states. 
-Previous posts:

Magna Carta is Dead in England



In the UK, you will be allowed to enter the country despite the fact that you habitually spew whatever words of hatred that you wish.

-As long as you are a Muslim.

If you are careful to differentiate between Muslim people and the hatred, violence, and subjection of women and non-Muslims that is promoted in the Koran and other Islamic writings, however, you will be prohibited from entering the nation.

-From the first link:

"In a not unexpected — but nevertheless shocking — move, Britain’s Home Office has denied entry into the UK to Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller. The two anti-sharia advocates had planned to join Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll this weekend in laying flowers at the site of Lee Rigby’s* murder in Woolwich, in honor of Armed Forces Day.


Unlike Geert Wilders at the time he was denied entry to Britain, Mr. Spencer and Ms. Geller are not on trial for “inciting hatred”. They have never been convicted of any crimes. They have never incited violence in any way. Their only “offense” has been to speak out repeatedly against Islamization and the dangers of Shariah......."

-From the fourth link:

"Devotion to jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls, and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer. Allah said that if a man fights the infidels, the infidels will be unable to prepare to fight."
"You may be wondering if it was I
 [Robert Spencer] or Pamela Geller who penned that hate-filled misrepresentation of the beautiful Islamic doctrine of jihad. But in fact, it was neither one of us. It was Mohammed al-Arefe, a Saudi Muslim cleric who believes that shedding Infidel blood and smashing Infidel skulls is pleasing to his god.

Apparently believing that such violence is an Islamic imperative is just fine with the British Home Office as long as one does so approvingly: Mohammed al-Arefe wasjust last week admitted into Britainwithout any difficulty. If one believes that such violence is an Islamic imperative but opposes it, however, watch out: that is not conducive to the public good....."

-From the second link:

"The backgrounds of the two banned Americans [Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller] were reviewed by the Home Secretary’s office and they were told in crystal clear terms,“your presence here is not conducive to the public good.”

The official notice went on to clarify, ”You are therefore instructed not to travel to the UK as you will be refused admission on arrival.”...."

Although modern Leftist revisionists (As they have with the Roman revolt against the Tarquins and virtually every other crucial victory for Liberty and the Rule of Law in Western History) have taken great paints to portray the event that occurred at Runnymede in 1215 as the mere work of aristocrats working to better their positions, the Magna Carta is indisputably a key event in the development of freedom in the West. We find nothing even remotely comparable in early, contemporary, or modern civilizations in  East or South Asia, the Islamic world, or the Americas. 

One of the main points to note about the Charter was that rulers are also subject to the Law and that they have no authority to make arbitrary decisions. Everyone must be treated equally under the Law.

The nation that gave us that legal precedent, jurists such as Sir William Blackstone, political thinkers such as John Locke and Edmund Burke, and piles of examples of stubborn stands for Liberty, is - like the US, no longer recognizable. Islamists who foment hatred of Jews, Christianity, Western Culture, even the UK itself, are free to enter that nation, but someone who works to inform people about the truth of Islam are barred from doing the same. 

You cant even talk about what Muslims say about their own religion.

Those who stood against the arbitrary rule of King John and defended Liberty against the King's ensuing reactionary moves must be rolling over in their graves. 

In the 20th century, the Left (Like it did with all Western counties) needed to change British society, but their  public school and media machines were not doing the job quickly enough to suit their tastes. They needed to get the electorate turned around before the realization that Leftism is a patent lie set in among the people. The solution was to import as many non-Western immigrants as possible. A key part of this strategy was to include massive amounts of immigrants from Muslim nations. Not only do Muslims vote for Liberal/Labor parties, they also would have,  as Islam is pan-national in its outlook, no appreciation for British sovereignty. Socialists want to do away with national boundaries, so Muslims would serve two purposes.

The plan, save for a few minor hiccups such as plagues of gang rapes of indigenous British girls, a massive increase in violent crime, widespread welfare fraud, the steady advancing of Sharia Law, and large-scale rioting, has worked out fairly well for the Left - even "Conservative" politicians have to ignore the facts and play down the effects of this policy if they want to keep their cushy jobs.

Now the Left and their so-called Conservative opponents have a tricky job; the mob will turn out for any event that the Muslims can use to justify yet more violence, so the politicians from both sides have to pander to them. 

As with most solutions to inherently wrongful policies, what has been implemented is a sub-policy of applying bandages - not to fix the problem, but to put a temporary stop to the bleeding. Those who work to protect the national and ethnic culture of the people of the UK, as well as anyone who dares to speak accurately about Islam, are either subjected to continual harassment by the authorities or left alone to be attacked by Leftists thugs such as those if Unite Against Fascism. If one who does the same  is a citizen of another nation,  he or she will be prevented even from visiting the UK.

The people of Western nations have precious little time left before it will be too late to save even a remnant of their respective countries. They can no longer turn a blind eye to what is being done to enslave their descendants. If the Left is not checked soon, the people will have to pack up and leave if they want to have a place to live in Freedom and in the spirit of their ancestors**.

We will have to consider a modern-day Volkerwanderung.






Monday, April 28, 2014

Driver Who Killed Boy Bicyclist Sues Victim/Family

About ten years ago, a young girl in NJ was seriously injured by a vehicle while crossing the road. As she hung on for life in the hospital (I think that she was in a coma), she was cited for jaywalking. On a local radio show, the host was noting the lack of empathy on the part of the police. A caller to the show stated that the driver was also a victim in this tragedy (which in this particular case appeared to be true) and then went on to claim that the child should be punished so that the guilt of the driver would be lessened.

To this day, I have never gotten over the utter pride, lack of shame, and cold-hardheartedness of the caller.

In the recent case of the 17 year-old bicyclist who was struck and killed by a driver, who went on to sue the victim/his family for civil damages, I assume that her primary motive is to obtain leverage as the victim's family is understandably suing her, but I can't help but note the similarity in an attitude that lacks any empathy.

http://www.torontosun.com/2014/04/25/driver-that-struck-teen-suing-dead-boys-family

"ALCONA, ONT. - Still in the throes of agony from losing their son in a vehicle crash, the parents of young Brandon Majewski are now reeling after they learned the woman who struck and killed him is suing their dead child.

“I feel like someone kicked me in the stomach — I’m over the edge,” the dead boy’s father, Derek Majewski, said. “Sometimes, it makes my blood boil.”.......


Brandon was struck from behind by an SUV and killed while his friend Richard McLean, 16, was seriously injured with a broken pelvis and other bones. His other pal Jake Roberts, 16, was knocked off his bike but sustained only scratches.

Now the driver of the SUV, Sharlene Simon, 42, a mother of three, formerly from Innisfil, is suing the dead boy for the emotional trauma she says she has suffered. She’s also suing the two other boys, as well as the dead boy’s parents, and even his brother, who has since died. She’s also suing the County of Simcoe for failing to maintain the road.
Even the family’s lawyer is in shock.

“In all of my years as a lawyer, I have never seen anyone ever sue a child that they killed,” Barrie lawyer Brian Cameron said. “It’s beyond the pale. I just couldn’t bring myself to tell them on the phone.”

After a face-to-face meeting Tuesday, the parents and step-parents left his office almost staggering in disbelief............................


“It blows my mind,” Brandon’s step-mom, Lisa Tessier, said. “We are all devastated. This is so cruel.”

In a statement of claim filed with the court, Simon is claiming $1.35 million in damages due to her psychological suffering, including depression, anxiety, irritability and post-traumatic stress. She blames the boys for negligence.

“They did not apply their brakes properly,” the claim states. “They were incompetent bicyclists.”


Simon’s lawyer did not respond to a request for comment from the Toronto Sun Friday.

Brandon’s father shakes his head.

“They’re kids!” he gasps. “And they have a right to make mistakes ... it was a wet, dark road — what about slowing down?”

He insists the reflectors on the bikes would have been visible.

A South Simcoe Police report shows Simon admitted that she was driving at 90 km/h in an 80 km/h zone on the two-lane road.[About 5 MPH]  She claims she didn’t see the boys or any of the orange-red pedal reflectors. The impact of the collision cracked the windshield of her SUV, dented the bumper, a headlight was busted, the roof where Brandon hit was dented and scratched and a side mirror dangled by its wires..........................

“This has ripped our family apart,” says Majewski. “And now this woman has the gall to try to profit from our dead child she killed? Profit from another boy who was almost crippled?”

“This thing haunts us,” he says. “It will never stop haunting us.”






Sunday, April 27, 2014

Radiological Technician Forged Results on Over 1000 Mammograms

Once one stops doing his job, lies are needed to avoid being caught. Once the lies start, the hole is already too deep to simply climb out.

In time, the one who is stealing both a salary for drawing an undeserved paycheck and the necessary results for patients can only prolong the inevitable outcome.

Women understandably do not relish the thought of getting mammograms. Despite the need to be checked, they are not comfortable procedures, and as with both men and women, the fear of possible bad news is often enough to put off getting checked.

For the victims who did in fact undergo the procedure but were willfully provided false negative results, the feeling of being robbed must be overwhelming. Not only are lumps consequently only detected when a mastectomy is the only option, even a full removal and chemotherapy and/or radiation treatments may not be enough to save one's life.

I am not familiar Georgia criminal statutes, but I with still wonder why the employee was not charged with multiple counts of impersonating a physician.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/27/former-georgia-technician-falsified-nearly-1300-mammogram-reports/?intcmp=latestnews

"PERRY, Ga. – Sharon Holmes found a lump in her left breast quite by accident. At work one day as a high school custodian, her hand brushed up against her chest and she felt a knot sticking out. She was perplexed. After all, just three months earlier, she had been given an all-clear sign from her doctor after a mammogram.

A new mammogram in February 2010 showed she in fact had an aggressive stage 2 breast cancer. The horror of the discovery was compounded by the reason: The earlier test results she had gotten weren't just read incorrectly. They were falsified.

She wasn't alone in facing this news. The lead radiological technologist at Perry Hospital in Perry, a small community about 100 miles south of Atlanta, had for about 18 months been signing off on mammograms and spitting out reports showing nearly 1,300 women were clear of any signs of breast cancer or abnormalities.

Except that she was wrong. Holmes and nine other women were later shown to have lumps or cancerous tumors growing inside them.

Holmes said the discovery was horrific enough. With a son in his 20s and another in high school at the time, she trembled at the thought of leaving them without a mother. "To me, that meant a death sentence," she said. She underwent successful surgery the month after the cancer was discovered to remove the lump from her breast and followed that with chemotherapy and radiation treatments.

Her breast has been cancer-free for four years and subsequent cancers found elsewhere, in her lymph nodes and thyroid, have been successfully treated. Now she just prays it doesn't come back.

But to find out later that she had been deceived made it even worse. "I'm thinking I'm doing what I'm supposed to do, getting my tests done, and then I find out someone else isn't doing their job," Holmes told The Associated Press.

The tech, Rachael Rapraeger, pleaded guilty earlier this month to 10 misdemeanor charges of reckless conduct and one felony charge of computer forgery. She was sentenced to serve up to six months in a detention center, to serve 10 years on probation during which she can't work in the health care field and to pay a $12,500 fine.
The reasons she gave were vague. She told police she had personal issues that caused her to stop caring about her job, that she had fallen behind processing the piles of mammogram films that stacked up. So she went into the hospital's computer system, assumed the identities of physicians, and gave each patient a clear reading, an investigative report says. That allowed her to avoid the time-consuming paperwork required before the films are brought to a reading room for radiologists to examine, her lawyer Floyd Buford told the AP.
Her actions were uncovered in April 2010 after a patient who'd received a negative report had another mammogram three months later at another hospital that revealed she had breast cancer. As hospital staff began to investigate, it was determined that the doctor whose name was on the faulty report had not been at the hospital the day the report was filed. Rapraeger quickly confessed to her supervisor that she was responsible and was fired from her job about a week later, according to an investigator's report.

Rapraeger told police she knew what she was doing wasn't right, but that she didn't consider the consequences until she realized a patient with cancer had been told her scan was clear......"

Saturday, April 26, 2014

No Free Speech in UK - Man Arrested for Quoting Churchill on Islam

This is yet another example of what has happened to the nation that gave us both (In American English-"The") Magna Carta and the principles of the Whig Party:

http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/04/paul-weston-busted-for-quoting-churchill/

"........At around 2pm Mr Weston was standing on the steps of Winchester Guildhall, addressing the passers-by in the street with a megaphone. He quoted the following excerpt about Islam from the book The River War by Winston Churchill:

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property — either as a child, a wife, or a concubine — must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.”

Reportedly a woman came out of the Guildhall and asked Mr Weston if he had the authorisation
[Italics are mine and it's British spelling] to make this speech. When he answered that he didn’t, she told him “It’s disgusting!” and then called the police.

Six or seven officers arrived. They talked with the people standing nearby, asking questions about what had happened. The police had a long discussion with Mr Weston, lasting about 40 minutes.

At about 3pm he was arrested. They searched him, put him in a police van and took him away."
This is an absolute disgrace I can't believe that so many of us who live in the Anglosphere are doing nothing while the most free nations ever to exist are steadily being transformed into totalitarian states. 
-Previous posts:

Magna Carta is Dead in England



In the UK, you will be allowed to enter the country despite the fact that you habitually spew whatever words of hatred that you wish.

-As long as you are a Muslim.

If you are careful to differentiate between Muslim people and the hatred, violence, and subjection of women and non-Muslims that is promoted in the Koran and other Islamic writings, however, you will be prohibited from entering the nation.

-From the first link:

"In a not unexpected — but nevertheless shocking — move, Britain’s Home Office has denied entry into the UK to Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller. The two anti-sharia advocates had planned to join Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll this weekend in laying flowers at the site of Lee Rigby’s* murder in Woolwich, in honor of Armed Forces Day.


Unlike Geert Wilders at the time he was denied entry to Britain, Mr. Spencer and Ms. Geller are not on trial for “inciting hatred”. They have never been convicted of any crimes. They have never incited violence in any way. Their only “offense” has been to speak out repeatedly against Islamization and the dangers of Shariah......."

-From the fourth link:

"Devotion to jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls, and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer. Allah said that if a man fights the infidels, the infidels will be unable to prepare to fight."
"You may be wondering if it was I
 [Robert Spencer] or Pamela Geller who penned that hate-filled misrepresentation of the beautiful Islamic doctrine of jihad. But in fact, it was neither one of us. It was Mohammed al-Arefe, a Saudi Muslim cleric who believes that shedding Infidel blood and smashing Infidel skulls is pleasing to his god.

Apparently believing that such violence is an Islamic imperative is just fine with the British Home Office as long as one does so approvingly: Mohammed al-Arefe wasjust last week admitted into Britainwithout any difficulty. If one believes that such violence is an Islamic imperative but opposes it, however, watch out: that is not conducive to the public good....."

-From the second link:

"The backgrounds of the two banned Americans [Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller] were reviewed by the Home Secretary’s office and they were told in crystal clear terms,“your presence here is not conducive to the public good.”

The official notice went on to clarify, ”You are therefore instructed not to travel to the UK as you will be refused admission on arrival.”...."

Although modern Leftist revisionists (As they have with the Roman revolt against the Tarquins and virtually every other crucial victory for Liberty and the Rule of Law in Western History) have taken great paints to portray the event that occurred at Runnymede in 1215 as the mere work of aristocrats working to better their positions, the Magna Carta is indisputably a key event in the development of freedom in the West. We find nothing even remotely comparable in early, contemporary, or modern civilizations in  East or South Asia, the Islamic world, or the Americas. 

One of the main points to note about the Charter was that rulers are also subject to the Law and that they have no authority to make arbitrary decisions. Everyone must be treated equally under the Law.

The nation that gave us that legal precedent, jurists such as Sir William Blackstone, political thinkers such as John Locke and Edmund Burke, and piles of examples of stubborn stands for Liberty, is - like the US, no longer recognizable. Islamists who foment hatred of Jews, Christianity, Western Culture, even the UK itself, are free to enter that nation, but someone who works to inform people about the truth of Islam are barred from doing the same. 

You cant even talk about what Muslims say about their own religion.

Those who stood against the arbitrary rule of King John and defended Liberty against the King's ensuing reactionary moves must be rolling over in their graves. 

In the 20th century, the Left (Like it did with all Western counties) needed to change British society, but their  public school and media machines were not doing the job quickly enough to suit their tastes. They needed to get the electorate turned around before the realization that Leftism is a patent lie set in among the people. The solution was to import as many non-Western immigrants as possible. A key part of this strategy was to include massive amounts of immigrants from Muslim nations. Not only do Muslims vote for Liberal/Labor parties, they also would have,  as Islam is pan-national in its outlook, no appreciation for British sovereignty. Socialists want to do away with national boundaries, so Muslims would serve two purposes.

The plan, save for a few minor hiccups such as plagues of gang rapes of indigenous British girls, a massive increase in violent crime, widespread welfare fraud, the steady advancing of Sharia Law, and large-scale rioting, has worked out fairly well for the Left - even "Conservative" politicians have to ignore the facts and play down the effects of this policy if they want to keep their cushy jobs.

Now the Left and their so-called Conservative opponents have a tricky job; the mob will turn out for any event that the Muslims can use to justify yet more violence, so the politicians from both sides have to pander to them. 

As with most solutions to inherently wrongful policies, what has been implemented is a sub-policy of applying bandages - not to fix the problem, but to put a temporary stop to the bleeding. Those who work to protect the national and ethnic culture of the people of the UK, as well as anyone who dares to speak accurately about Islam, are either subjected to continual harassment by the authorities or left alone to be attacked by Leftists thugs such as those if Unite Against Fascism. If one who does the same  is a citizen of another nation,  he or she will be prevented even from visiting the UK.

The people of Western nations have precious little time left before it will be too late to save even a remnant of their respective countries. They can no longer turn a blind eye to what is being done to enslave their descendants. If the Left is not checked soon, the people will have to pack up and leave if they want to have a place to live in Freedom and in the spirit of their ancestors**.

We will have to consider a modern-day Volkerwanderung.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Free Speech Under Serious Threat in the UK.


I saw this report today in The Blaze, but a search turned up an article from The Telegraph, which was published on the 4th of July of all days.

In the United Kingdom, the wellspring of the strongest traditions of individual liberty and free speech that can be found in the entire world, it not only verboten to speak your mind, but you also are prohibited from making any statements concerning Christian teachings - this in a country in which Christianity is the official religion.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10159420/Christian-arrested-for-calling-homosexuality-a-sin-warns-of-real-life-thought-police.html

"Tony Miano, 49, a former senior police officer from the US, was held for around six hours, had his fingerprints and DNA taken and was questioned about his faith, after delivering a sermon about “sexual immorality” on a London street.
Mr Miano, who served as a Deputy Sherriff in Los Angeles County, said his experience suggested that the term “thought police” had become a reality in the UK.

He said he was amazed that it was now possible “in the country that produced the Magna Carta” for people to be arrested for what they say.

Mr Miano, who was provided with a solicitor by the Christian Legal Centre, was arrested under the controversial clause of the Public Order Act which bans “insulting” words or behaviour.............
He was speaking from a passage from Thessalonians which mentions “sexual immorality” and listed homosexuality alongside “fornication” as examples what he believed went against “God’s law”.

A woman out shopping called the police to complain that she was offended, prompting two officers to be dispatched to arrest him........

During the subsequent questioning at Wimbledon police station he was asked about his beliefs on what constitutes “sin” and about how he would treat gay people in hypothetical situations.

“As the questioning started it became apparent that the interrogation was about more than the incident that too place in the street but what I believed and how I think,” he said.

“I was being interrogated about my thoughts … that is the basic definition of thought police.

He said he had arrested many people in his career but never over something they believed.

“It surprised me that it is possible for a person to be taken to jail for their thoughts,” he said.

“It surprised me that here in the country that produced the Magna Carta that an otherwise law abiding person could loose his freedom because one person was offended by the content of my speech.”
He said he feared Britain and other countries were already on a “slippery slope” towards the erosion of free speech and has written to MPs outlining his experiences.

Andrea Williams, of the Christian legal Centre, said: “We might joke about there being ‘thought police’ but this case shows that it has already become a reality.

“Sadly we are seeing cases like this increasingly often”.


Mr Miano said that after he was questioned he was advised by his solicitor that police had indicated that they expected to charge him with a public order offence.

But after being sent back to his cell for around another hour he was informed that an inspector had decided that no further action would be taken. He was released about midnight........."


The land that gave birth to some of the greatest political minds in history has been transformed, and the results are not pretty.

When I think about the manner in which members of Parliament would traditionally address each other, or the biting content of newspaper articles in Great Britain in the 18th century, and compare these to the Orwellian restrictions of public speaking in that nation today, my stomach turns.

Most Americans are not only blissfully unaware that our Mother Country is no longer the bastion of Liberty that she was for so long. They are even less aware that the plans are in place to bring about similar restrictions in the US. 

In regards to Islam, Hillary Clinton has for some time been involved with moves to curb the First Amendment by making restrictions on speech that "defames religion". Feminists don't seem to have any beef with the manner in which women are treated by men in Islamic nations or families. 

At this point, Orwellian restrictions on free speech are still at the mob level. You will not be charged with an offense, but rest assured that the mob will rise up and attack you. Any reference to privileged groups or "lifestyles" will earn you a loss of employment, boycotting of your business and all who do business with you, acts of vandalism against your property, and other retaliatory measures for daring to speak out.








Friday, April 25, 2014

Georgian President - Don't Alienate Russia

Georgia knows fully well what can happen when you poke a bear with a stick one too many times.

The president of this small former Soviet republic has more common sense than do many Americans. It was at least partly due to our meddling that Russia felt the need to launch her 2008 invasion of two Russian majority regions in that nation.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/04/25/ap-interview-georgia-president-warns-against-alienating-russia-over-ukraine/

"PRAGUE – The president of Georgia, a country whose territory was invaded by Russian troops in 2008, has warned Western countries against alienating Russia over the Ukraine crisis.

Giorgi Margvelashvili says Russia could become "even more aggressive, unpredictable and dangerous."

In an interview with The Associated Press in Prague on Friday, Margvelashvili said it should be clearly stated to Russia "that relations between neighbors or countries around the world aren't built through military interventions."......."


"By Patrick J. Buchanan

..............Most deeply involved in Crimea’s crisis are Russia and Ukraine. Yet, looking at the UN numbers, there seems an element of absurdity in this confrontation that could lead to a shooting war.

Between 2012 and 2050, Ukraine, war or no war, will lose one-fourth of its population. Eleven to twelve million Ukrainians will vanish from the earth, a figure far higher than the highest estimate of the death toll of the horrific Holodomor of 1932-33.

Russia will lose 22 million people, with her population falling below 121 million. Every month between now and 2050, close to 50,000 Russians will disappear.......................

Our War Party is demanding that we send military assistance and possibly troops to Poland, the Baltic republics and Rumania, and bring Ukraine and Georgia into NATO.

This would mean America would fight Russia to defend them all, should another clash occur as in 2008 in Georgia and today in Crimea.

Does this make sense — for any of us?

According to the UN, there are 6.3 million Lithuanians, Latvians and Estonians. And these three Baltic republics will see their combined populations sink by one million by 2050.

How would a NATO-Russia war over Estonia benefit Estonia?


In March 1939, Britain gave a war guarantee to Poland and, honoring it, declared war on Germany. That was the end of the British Empire. And how did the “Good War” work out for Poland?

Her Jewish population of 3 million was largely annihilated, and, by some estimates, 3 million Catholic Poles perished. Poland then endured four decades of rule by Polish satraps of Soviet commissars.

V-E Day brought something other than victory for the nation for whom Britain went to war.

Today, Poland’s population is back to 38 million. But on the UN chart, Poland is on schedule to lose 4 million Poles by mid-century.

While our War Party debates where to draw the red line against Russia, the UN projects that the 10 countries on both sides of that line — Russia, Belarus, the Baltic republics, Ukraine, Poland, Hungary, Rumania, Bulgaria — will together lose 50 million people by mid-century, and another 50 million by the end of the century.

The fertility rate in these 10 countries is barely two-thirds of what is needed to maintain an existing population.

Remarkable. The century following the peaceful end of the Cold War and the liberation of the captive nations may witness population losses for Europe that exceed those of two world wars and rival those of the Black Death of the 14th century.

European Man is an endangered species. European Man is dying out. By 2050, Russia, the fourth most populous nation in 1950, will be 15th, behind Egypt, and far behind Congo and Tanzania. The only Western nation in the top 14 will be the USA. But most Americans will then trace their ancestry to Asia, Africa and Latin America.

Since 1914, all the great European empires — British, French, German, Russian, Italian — have vanished. All the great armies and navies have melted away. All are being invaded and repopulated by African, Asian and Middle Eastern peoples they once ruled. And almost all of the native-born populations of Europe are aging and dying and passing away...."

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Illegals Arrested for Trying to Leave US

It's no secret that Obama's supposed record-breaking deportations are a farce:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/370784/obama-administration-inflating-deportation-numbers-andrew-stiles

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/february-12-2013/how-obama-administration-inflates-deportation-statistics.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Regarding the deportations of illegals, the strongly Leftist National Public Radio recently took note of what at first glance appears confusing, but makes sense when taken in context.

Illegals who are "self-deporting" which means that they are attempting to leave the US, are being detained - for several months, and then are deported by the US.

The strategy  is simple and serves two purposes for the Obama administration:

-Grabbing people who are making it very easy to be caught and who actually want to leave allows for a major shot in the arm for deportation statistics.

-You're not going anywhere until we deport you and get some stats.

-Others who fear the probability of being detained for months will be less likely to attempt to leave the US, thus adding to the numbers of illegals on whom the Obama administration and their Republican collaborators want to confer citizenship (and boost the Democratic voting bloc to a point where national elections are a mere formality*).

-You're not going anywhere until we make you a citizen, at which point you can go anywhere in the US.

http://www.npr.org/2014/04/23/306238506/the-curious-practice-of-bringing-immigrants-back-to-deport-them

"A number of undocumented immigrants are being arrested and imprisoned, not while trying to enter the U.S. as you would expect, they're being caught while trying to leave. That's right, people trying to self-deport, as some politicians have put it, are being prosecuted and given prison sentences then deported anyway. NPR's Ted Robbins has that story.............

JOE AGOSTTINI: They're going to go and see if anyone is transporting illegal proceeds or they're transporting more than $10,000 of money or checks that need to be reported.

ROBBINS: Mexican cartels send big money from U.S. sales south as they smuggle tons of drugs north. Assistant Nogales Port Director Joe Agosttini says the southbound inspections are being done to disrupt that ongoing cycle of drugs and money.

AGOSTTINI: But if in the process you discover that the person is illegally in the U.S., then the person has to pay a consequence.

ROBBINS: That's what has people puzzled. Even if someone doesn't have ties to cartels or any contraband, they're arrested 20 feet from leaving the U.S.
ROBERT BRACK: I've not seen that historically, so it was a significant shift in prosecution policy. And it really surprised me. I didn't see that coming.

ROBBINS: Robert Brack is a federal judge is Las Cruces, New Mexico. He's been called the busiest judge in America - sentencing more than 14,000 people over the last decade for trying to enter the country illegally. He says he only began seeing people prosecuted for trying to leave in the last year or two. Judge Brack says he understands why officers would arrest people trying to smuggle cash to Mexican cartels.

BRACK: But the people that I see didn't have any money. They've never had any money, and they certainly don't have any guns. It's just people that were in the country without permission trying to leave......................

ROBBINS: No one knows exactly how many people have been prosecuted trying to leave the U.S. at land ports. The statistics are lumped in with people caught trying to enter illegally. Cheryl Blum is a lawyer in Tucson. She says she's defended dozens of cases of people caught going back to Mexico to see sick family members, even people wanting to go back permanently. She doesn't understand why.

CHERYL BLUM: If they're trying to leave, they're actually trying to obey the law. I think to stop them and then use up resources just to try to punish these folks is a complete waste of money. It's a complete waste of time. It's an absurdity.

ROBBINS: People convicted after being arrested leaving end up in prison for as long as six months. The bill for that sentence, up to $160 daily for each inmate. Even people who want stricter immigration enforcement think that's a waste. Ira Mehlman is with FAIR, the Federation for American Immigration Reform.

IRA MEHLMAN: They are expending resources on people who are in the process of removing themselves from the country while neglecting the millions and millions of people who are dug in and aren't leaving the country.

ROBBINS: We asked Customs and Border Protection officials why people who want to leave are being arrested. We got no answer. Ted Robbins, NPR News."

----------------------------------------------------------

Previous posts:

http://thehotgates480bc.blogspot.com/2014/01/monica-crowley-amnesty-will-effect.html

Monica Crowley - Amnesty Will Effect "Fundamentally Transformation" of US

Monica. Crowley has become one of the precious few who will lay before our eyes the consequences of what Republican legislators are poised to do - accomplish Obama's goal of fundamentally transforming the United States.

We must note that Obama's 2008 statement about transforming the United States from its what it was actually created to be remade into what he wanted did nothing to damage his campaign. Although one would certainly be hard-pressed to name one nation other than the US that should not undergo a change of its core and foundational elements, that fact was ignored by more than enough individuals; Obama won easily. The "why" and "how" of that historical reality will someday be debated - possibly centuries after us, but we can affirm with reasonable certainty that Cultural Marxism was a major factor.

I have noted in previous posts that a grant of amnesty and citizenship will spell the effective end of our republic. The Democratic Party will in all likelihood lock in the current 38 (and with amnesty probably more) electoral votes of Texas, which will secure for them any Presidential election for the next several decades.

-With that comes the flood of appointees to the federal judiciary, and that includes the US Supreme Court.

Even if Texas were to squeak by - for the moment, relatively unscathed, The House of Representatives and the Senate would be solidly Democratic.

The US will have been unalterably ruined. 

Although Conservatives have a real chance of doing some damage in 2014 and 2016 to Progressive legislators and other candidates who have to drag the ball and chain of Obamacare and the myriad of their scandals, Republicans lawmakers would rather complete Obama's transformation for him.

http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/immigration-the-lefts-fundamental-transformation-of-the-nation/


"So. The Democrats are in freefall. Their “landmark” legislation, Obamacare, rammed through without a single Republican vote, is in collapse. The president has been exposed as a liar (see: “If you like your health plan, you can keep it. Period.”) His poll numbersare tanking, from job approval to competency to trustworthiness to personal likeability.

The poll numbers for the Democrat party are in the gutter as well, with the Republican party now pulling ahead on the generic ballot. Democrats are fleeing the scene of their own accident, refusing to be seen with the president and distancing themselves from the wreck that is Obamacare.

In other words, the Democrats are on the run, vulnerable, weak, and poised for a major defeat.

So what are the Republicans doing? Are they going for the jugular, attacking nonstop until the election, and showing no mercy? In other words, acting like Democrats…

Of course not. They’re Republicans. They are stepping in to help the Dems out. 

Instead of pounding Obamacare, the president, and the Democrats with the facts of an atrocious stab at socialized medicine and the lies they’ve used to push it, the GOP appears ready to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by switching gears to the highly polarizing issue of immigration. Never mind that immigration doesn’t even score more than 2 percent in polls asking what the most important issue is to the country. Rather than let this sleeping dog lie (at least through November), the Republican leadership is jumping to the assistance of the Democrats by supporting amnesty.


"...........if the government controls your health care, the government controls you. Obamacare was never about your health care. It was about government power and control.

And so it is with immigration “reform.” For Obama and the Left, it’s not about actually dealing forcefully and effectively with the immigration issue. If that were the case, the administration would be faithfully enforcing the laws we have on the books. It is not.They seek this “reform” for one simple reason: because immigration is the final missing piece of the “fundamental transformation of the nation.”

If they can get amnesty for 12 million (who knows what the real number is? 12 million? 18 million? 30 million?) illegals, they know they’ve got the country in a headlock.

Most Hispanics are natural Democrat voters. Not all, obviously. Many believe in hard work, individual liberty, economic liberty, and obeying the law. But the majority vote Democrat, and the party has been working hard to lock them into government dependency. 

If amnesty goes through, the Democrats will flood the zone with millions of more Democrat voters, possibly flip Texas blue, and get their long sought-after permanent Democrat voting majority. If that happens, you will never again see a Ronald Reagan or a George W. Bush. You may never again see a GOP majority in Congress. The Republicans will be relegated to permanent minority status. And a shrinking one at that.
This is the goal of the Democrats.

Why on earth would Republicans want to help them achieve it? Because they think they’ll be “rewarded” by Hispanic voters? That didn’t happen after the 1986 amnesty. In fact, the percentage of Hispanics voting GOP actually went DOWN after that amnesty. To take the issue off the table? Forget it. As soon as the path to amnesty is in place, Democrats will accelerate the process to get them voting as fast as possible, so the “issue” will never be off the table for Republicans.............

While strangling themselves right out of existence."


Let's see what Pat Buchanan says about a grant of amnesty and citizenship:


"Out of the Republican retreat on Maryland’s Eastern shore comes word that the House leadership is raising the white flag of surrender on immigration.

The GOP will agree to halt the deportation of 12 million illegal aliens, and sign on to a blanket amnesty. It only asks that the 12 million not be put on a path to citizenship.

Sorry, but losers do not dictate terms. Rich Trumka of the AFL-CIO says amnesty is no longer enough. Illegal aliens must be put on a path to citizenship and given green cards to work — and join unions.

Rep. Paul Ryan and the Wall Street Journal are for throwing in the towel. Legalize them all and start them on the path to citizenship.

A full and final capitulation. Let’s get it over with...........


Almost all of those breaking our laws, crossing the border, and overstaying their visas are young, poor or working class. Between 80 and 90 percent are from Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America.

They are Third World peoples. They believe in government action and government programs that provide their families with free education, health care, housing, food, and income subsidies. They are not Bob Taft or Barry Goldwater conservatives.

Perhaps 85 percent of all immigrants, legal and illegal, more than a million a year now, are people of color. And while over 70 percent of Hispanics and Asians voted Democratic for Obama, among voters of African descent, the Obama vote was well above 90 percent.

Four of every five U.S. citizens of Asian, African and Hispanic descent vote Democratic in presidential elections. And it is their numbers that are growing. Already they are well over a third of the U.S. population.


As has been observed often, America, demographically, is going to look like California. And while Nixon won California all five times he was on a national ticket, and Reagan won California in landslides all four times he ran, California has not gone Republican in six straight presidential elections..........

If Bush I had built that border fence back in 1992 and declared a moratorium on legal immigration that fall, as many implored him to do, the party of the Bushes would not be facing its demise well before midcentury."


Senator Ted Cruz also believes that amnesty will be a serious problem:


"Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is hoping fellow Republican House leaders take heed and not push this year for immigration reform measures with mid-term elections so closely at hand.
But that’s not what’s happening.

Republicans, along with leadership, are meeting at a three day retreat along Maryland’s eastern shore Thursday, and the top piece of business is immigration. Republican House Speaker John Boehner, from Ohio and Rep. Paul Ryan, of Wisconsin, among others, are trying to advance immigration legislation prior to heading into the midterm election campaign.

The senator said in a statement emailed to TheBlaze that “amnesty is wrong in any circumstance.”

Republicans need to focus on winning against Obama’s failed policies and not push for immigration legislation that is already presenting numerous legal obstacles and will demoralize voters, many of whom are opposed to amnesty, he added.

“The biggest thing we could do to mess that up would be if the House passed an amnesty bill…”

“Right now, Republican leadership in both chambers is aggressively urging Members to stand down on virtually every front: on the continuing resolution, on the budget, on the farm bill, on the debt ceiling,” Cruz said. “They may or may not be right, but their argument is that we should focus exclusively on Obamacare and on jobs. In that context, why on earth would the House dive into immigration right now? It makes no sense, unless you’re Harry Reid. Republicans are poised for an historic election this fall–a conservative tidal wave much like 2010. The biggest thing we could do to mess that up would be if the House passed an amnesty bill–or any bill perceived as an amnesty bill–that demoralized voters going into November.”..........

“Anyone pushing an amnesty bill right now should go ahead and put a ‘Harry Reid for Majority Leader’ bumper sticker on their car, because that will be the likely effect if Republicans refuse to listen to the American people and foolishly change the subject from Obamacare to amnesty,” he said."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------