Sunday, May 13, 2012

Revision:Native British Rape Travesty - Paul Weston Speaks Out

Towards the end of this post, I briefly referred to an encounter in Tain Bo Cuailnge (English -The Cattle Raid of Cooley) between an Irish Queen and the guy that was going to help her in the contest with her husband. The more I thought about it, the more that I felt that the reference was too vague. I dug out the source to cite it. While doing so, I found that the quote was actually "Friendly thighs" as opposed to "happy". I guess that "friendly" is even more enticing.
Quote from How the Irish Saved Civilization. The excerpt from The Cattle Raid of Cooley is included on page 57. The marital spat starts a few pages earlier.

Since I am revising, I thought that I would also cite the quote from the woman who was insulted for being too liberal in her social life. I also corrected "Gaulish" to "Caledonian" - I have no idea why I wrote Gaulish (Though Gauls too were Celts). My head was pounding last night, so maybe my brain was on half speed.

From Cassius Dio:*.html
"In this connexion, a very witty remark is reported to have been made by the wife of Argentocoxus, a Caledonian, to Julia Augusta. When the empress was jesting with her, after the treaty, about the free intercourse of her sex with men in Britain, she replied: "We fulfil the demands of nature in a much better way than do you Roman women; for we consort openly with the best men, whereas you let yourselves be debauched in secret by the vilest." Such was the retort of the British woman."

Paul Weston is the Chairman of the British Freedom Party. Mr. Weston has weighed in on this subject in the link below:

Mr. Weston calls a lot of people on the carpet for what is essentially complicity in these crimes. I particular, he tears apart the cops who failed to to do that for which they are paid or at least speak out - presumably for fear of their jobs, pensions, and promotions. The cops knew that vicious patterns had developed and refused to address them.

Here is a piece of Weston's post:

"And this is not just a one-off case. It’s not only in Britain where this sort of thing happens, because the multiple gang rapes of indigenous girls by Muslims is replicated in every country where Muslims co-exist with non-Muslims:

There is a rape epidemic in Oslo. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslim, the vast majority of the victims are Norwegian Girls.

There is a rape epidemic in Malmö. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslim, the vast majority of the victims are Swedish girls.

There is a rape epidemic in Copenhagen. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslim, the vast majority of the victims are Danish girls.

There is a rape epidemic in Sydney. The vast majority of the perpetrators are Muslims, the vast majority of the victims are Australian girls.
I think we can safely say, then, that it is indeed a matter of one particular religion, Islam, rather than the liberal/left’s obscene portrayal of it as simply an Asian problem, and it is indeed a racial problem when the victims are overwhelmingly native Europeans.

Thirteen separate towns and cities have been identified in Britain where this has been happening, and it now turns out the authorities have known about it since the early 1990s. In other words hundreds, possibly thousands of vulnerable and under-age British girls have been raped and both physically and psychologically damaged for life, with at least two taking their own lives, because the liberal/left refuse to accept the reality of Islam.

What is worse, even when the whole disgusting issue is dragged into the limelight, they still refuse to recognise that Islam is a supremacist ideology. But Islam considers non-Muslims to be second class citizens, and Islam considers women to be second class citizens. Infidel females therefore can be raped with impunity in the House of War — a Koranic label for all parts of the world which are not ruled by Islam."

 In some instances, the police could not demonstrate that they had done anything at all even after the victim reached out for help.
The following is related and was written by Takuan Seiyo:

"As has now transpired, police, public prosecutors and social workers knew about these blood-curdling abuses since 2002, and ignored them because they feared being called racist. They ignored the complaints of a 15 year-old who told them she was being driven all over town to be raped by up to five men every day. Singled out, as she relayed, because she was white, vulnerable and under-age."

Note that Seiyo uses even more sarcasm than I do (If that is possible). He refers a couple of times to Japanese Buddhists as the assailants in the crimes. The reason he does this may be lost on a new reader. The British Press is notorious for going no farther than the term "Asian" when referring to criminals who hail from Pakistan or other idyllic nations such as those in the Middle East. In the US, "Asian" is only used when referring to those of the Far East. Seiyo's point is twofold; contemptible actions such as these are almost solely restricted to those who follow Islam, and certain peoples, such as Japanese, almost never commit such atrocities. (Yes, I know about the WWII-era Japanese and detest that beyond measure - I am talking about something that started in the 7th Century and has accelerated today)

Here are some details from the story:

"Greater Manchester Police and the Crown Prosecution Service have now apologised after they failed to bring the case of the first victim - Girl A - to trial following her cry for help in August 2008.
One 13 year-old victim became pregnant and had the child aborted while another was forced to have sex with 20 men in one night, Liverpool Crown Court heard.
Complaints to social workers and the police were ignored because they were "petrified of being called racist", former Labour MP for Keighley Ann Cryer said.

Girl A told police that she had been raped and provided DNA evidence from her attacker, however the CPS twice decided not to prosecute him.

The 15 year-old's abuse continued and at its height she was being driven to flats and houses to be raped by up to five men a night, four or five days a week. She was singled out because she was white, vulnerable and under-age.

Her ordeal only ended when her teachers forced social workers to intervene after she fell pregnant and they became concerned by the number of Asian men picking her up from school.

Girl A said that in a six-hour interview she gave police details about her abusers and where the attacks took place. Crucially, too, she handed officers underwear that proved she had been raped by two men in a single attack.

"I hoped they were going to do something and it would stop," she said.

"But it just carried on. It just started again with different men and more men this time, and that's when it started becoming up to five men a day". "

The cops finally did something after School officials, probably knowing that they too had hitherto not done enough, reported that they were concerned as the men, who apparently were so exited and thus impatient, were picking the victim up after school. The vicious creeps must have been rubbing their hands together like Flounder on Animal House and saying " Oh boy this is going to be great".  

Seiyo has also noted something that I have mentioned in a number of previous posts on this very issue and that of of the Leader of the Norwegian Worker's Youth League, who ran for the ferry to flee Utoya Island during the Breivik attack, leaving the teenagers behind to be slaughtered. What in Bloody Hell has happened to manliness in the West? Why are we not making these people fearful of even considering doing this to our women and girls?

The people of the UK, in this case mostly those of England, have never had a reputation for being anything other than scrappers. Seiyo notes more of the modern examples of bravery and determination, but I prefer to go father back; many Celtic Britons fiercely resisted Roman rule, they also put up more than a decent defense against the Anglo-Saxons, and the Saxons themselves stubbornly refused to be conquered by the Danes and Norwegians. After the victory of William the Conqueror and the institution of Norman rule in England, the English people maintained their identity and their national sovereignty, up to and including their defeat of the Spanish Armada. This is an event for which I must be, since my country was but a zygote in Roanoke North Carolina and Jamestown was yet to be founded at the time, extraordinarily thankful. 

Seiyo quotes a Quisling of a Scholar on this ongoing crime against indigenous British girls:

"Let’s move on from the hopeless zombie cops to a British historian who is full of hope. “If we are to make this highly diverse society work, and I desperately hope that we do,” said David Starkey, PhD, CBE, FSA and a richly remunerated darling of Britain’s broadcast MSM, “what we should be focusing on is the astonishing record of change."

The esteemed Dr. Starkey avers that these “Asian” kuffar-pedophilia specialists have been acting “within their cultural norms.” Converting them to the British norms is a matter of explaining that the history of women in Britain was once “rather similar” to that in Pakistan, but now it has changed."
That is the response from a an who revels in the destruction of his nation. We must grovel before the conquering Mohammedans and explain to them that, although we were once like them, we are no longer that way anymore.

Of course this is not even remotely accurate. Celtic women were well known for dressing attractively and being more than willing to have a go with more than one man (When they wanted to do so). When a Caledonian (Also Celtic- pre-Scots invasion in Modern Scotland) woman was insulted by a Roman woman for what was being labeled as loose morals, the Gaul responded that they consort with the best men, while Roman women allow themselves to "be debauched in secret by the vilest". The Celtic Irish also were not unaware of a woman's prerogative to be open; one story tells of a Queen, having been annoyed at her husband the King, put together a contest. She offered the man who would obtain what she needed a reward and threw in the offer of her "happy thighs" to sweeten the deal. While the Saxons were certainly more rigid than that, they were not anywhere near the Muslims in restrictions on a woman's dress, speech, or her ability to leave the house without being tailed by a male relative. Even following their conversion to Christianity, nothing near the sort of tyranny against women that we see in Islam was ever known in that region.

As I have noted before, we have to retake our culture and our identity. We can't allow any of  this to go on any longer.

No comments:

Post a Comment