Few people are aware that, in the event of an absolute or substantial collapse of the official civil order in the US (I stress "official" as the vast majority of American communities will cooperate to quickly and efficiently establish local governing bodies with the ability to maintain order), the United Nations would be perfectly willing, if those in DC but ask for it, to send in their Peacekeeping contingents to do the job for us. The first task for such forces will in all probability have nothing to do with rounding up looters and criminal gangs. No, the UN, having a taste for defenseless citizens, will no doubt begin confiscation of all erstwhile legally acquired and possessed firearms from the citizens who have not been bothering anybody.
The UN Small Arms Treaty, which is supported by Obama and Hillary, is the first step in that process.
In the event that the people of the US meekly accept any UN involvement, could be assumed that we would not suffer any abuse from these troops? The following post paints an ugly picture of rampant sexual abuses and rapes committed by UN officials and troops.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/07/hypocrisy_and_sexual_predation_at_the_united_nations.html
Bolding is added.
"There are not many organizations around the world with less moral authority on rape prosecutions than the U.N. In fact, in the midst of its investigation on rape in Haiti, five U.N. "peacekeepers" were videotaped raping an 18-year-old Haitian man and laughing about it while he screamed. Two men pinned him down on a mattress and bent his elbows high up on his back, while another raped him. Two others periodically beat the victim, whose screams into the mattress pad are muffled but agonizing. A fifth, holding the video camera, laughs with the others. If the videotaped evidence isn't enough for you, a medical report on the victim found significant evidence of sexual assault.
In the process of conducting its scathing investigation on the lack of rape prosecutions in Haiti, the U.N. itself found no evidence of rape on this particular occasion, despite a widely circulated video of a man being raped. The exact quote, from U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq, said that the investigation was finalized, and "the investigators found out that these allegations of misconduct could not be substantiated. The U.N. Mission in Haiti says that no supporting evidence was provided by anyone[.]"
Fun Fact: The United States government pays 22% of the U.N.'s budget every year.
For years, the United Nations has repeatedly employed, promoted, and covered for a range of sexual predators, traffickers, rapists, and pedophiles on a scale that would stagger the average barhopping grope-meister.
In 2001, the United Nations was accused of running a child prostitution and sex-trafficking organization in Bosnia. U.N. officials promised a thorough investigation and announced that they had adopted new processes for ensuring that it would never happen again. But it did. Repeatedly. It just changed countries.
Throughout the 2000s, more and more such charges began surfacing from the Congo. U.N. policymakers, however, continue to claim that most of these charges do not qualify as sexual abuse because the perpetrators are not raping children anymore, like they used to. Instead of raping children and moving on, they are raping children and then paying them with candy in order to disguise child rape as child prostitution, a distinction only the most depraved of minds could make.
In a world in which child rape can be justified with a lollipop, it is easy to see how the U.N. can justify genocide for the opportunity to rape children. That is exactly what has happened in its ongoing mission in the Congo. It appears that in the worst humanitarian crisis since World War II, U.N. "peacekeepers" charged with resolving the Congolese Civil War have managed enough free time to rape several hundred girls and start a child pornography business. The genocide continues apace.
In the vast majority of these sex abuse charges in the Congo, the "peacekeepers" rationalized their pursuit of young children on the grounds that older ones are more likely to have AIDS. This, apparently, is what mid-level U.N. officials call "safe sex." A Frenchman named Didier Bourguet was the ringleader of the operation.
He is currently in jail for his deeds, but it took several years. U.N. officials have diplomatic immunity while "serving" overseas. As such, Bourguet managed to run a similar child porn operation out of the Central African Republic from 1998 to 2001, before he was moved to the Congo. Why was he moved? Because the U.N. knew what he was up to, but didn't want to have him brought back to France to be prosecuted. In the Congo he proceeded to further develop his child porn network until it came to light in 2004. Only then was he finally brought back to France and prosecuted.
Fun Fact: Many of Didier Bourguet's alleged victims will still be underage when his prison sentence is completed.
Last month, the U.N. appointed Robert Mugabe as a new "international envoy for tourism." Mugabe has ruled Zimbabwe with terror since 1980.
Does Mugabe have remarkable talents as a leader in the tourism industry that warrant an honor from the U.N.? It depends on what you mean by "talents." Zimbabwe borders Victoria Falls, one of the most spectacularly beautiful tourist attractions in the world. It does not take much talent to develop tourism there. Mugabe regards Victoria Falls as child's play.
His preferred form of tourism is a different kind of child's play -- specifically, child sex-trafficking. In this category he is surely among the world's leaders. The U.S. State Department's 2012 "Trafficking in Person's Report" is a thoroughly depressing read, but Zimbabwe is categorized as a "tier 3," the lowest rung on a ladder of depravity. Tier 3 is reserved for nations whose governments do not comply "with the minimum standards [of human trafficking prevention] and are not making significant efforts to do so." Does it surprise you that the sexual predators at the U.N. chose to honor Mugabe?"
My hopes are that any UN troops that are unfortunate enough to have been assigned here find out quickly that they are quite unwelcome
While we are on the pleasant topic of sexual abuse and rape, the Daily Mail reported that wealthy Arabs, desirous of having an enjoyable summer, are paying poor Egyptian families (With our petrodollars) to marry their daughters. These marriages don't tend to end on an Ozzie and Harriet note. If the wife is brought back to, say Saudi Arabia, she is treated as a maid. If she is left behind in Egypt, the girls has no recourse as the marriages are performed in either an illicit manner or were not registered properly.
Hat tip to Jihad Watch.
And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise.
And while Sunnis ostensibly reject this practice, it is rising among Saudis, and now we see it also here in Egypt. And as for the girls being underage, why not? Muhammad did it: "The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)." -- Bukhari 7.62.88
"Sordid trade in the 'summer brides': Arab tourists are 'buying underage Egyptian sex slaves' to serve them for just a few months,'" from the Daily Mail, July 15 (thanks to Kristian):
Wealthy tourists from the Persian Gulf are paying to marry under-age Egyptian girls just for the summer, according to a report.
These temporary marriages are not legally binding and end when the men return to their homes in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait.
The tourists pay a 'dowry' to poor families through intermediaries with prices ranging from £320 to £3,200.
The young victims - some under 18 - suffer sexual slavery and are forced to be servants to their 'husbands', claims the U.S. State Department report 'Trafficking in Persons'.
The shame of Aziza one of several 'summer wives' who live in villages around Giza, was highlighted by the paper.
Aziza - not her real name - married a 45-year-old man from Saudi Arabia when she was 17 because he promised to find a job for her brother in the Gulf, and gave her penniless parents the equivalent of £2,120, [sic]
The Saudi Arabian also bought her dresses and took her to top restaurants. He stayed a month before returning home, but promised she could join him later.
After waiting several months and now heavily pregnant, she tried to trace him through the Saudi embassy so her child could be formally recognised.
But her marriage was not officially registered which meant she could not prove her claim. Aziza had to return to her family and raise her baby as a single mother.
No foreigner can marry an Egyptian girl if there is an age difference of 10 years, according to state laws. But parents and marriage brokers are getting round the restriction.
They will forge birth certificates to make the girls appear older and the men younger. In 2009, a court in Alexandria jailed two registrars for conducting temporary marriages of hundreds of girls under 18.
But the report found that many parents will marry their daughter without her consent and often the girls agree to the arrangement because their families have no money...."
Again, I will go with my old line that Islam ruins fathers more than anyone else. In the vast majority of cases in which a daughter is sold or otherwise forced to marry someone, the father is a Muslim. The nations in which these fathers live were not always that way - in the pre-Islamic history of these countries, they protected their daughters.
-From an earlier post in which a treated the subject of fathers in Islamic societies.
http://thehotgates480bc.blogspot.com/2012/01/15-year-old-girl-tortured-by-husbands.html
The people of Afghanistan are descended from proud peoples, mainly Indo-European Iranians ( Not Persian of modern Iran, which is a subgroup of Iranian) and Turkics (Not Ottomans and others of Modern Turkey, also subgroups of the widespread ethnic Turks). These were fiercely independent peoples who no doubt may have terrorized their enemies but did not engage in terrorizing their own family members by marrying them off to be abused, forced into prostitution, mutilated, or killed by their new families.
Most are not aware that Alexander the Great's first wife*, Roxanne (Or Roxana) was the daughter of a Iranian noble named Oxyartes. This man was a proud warrior and leader. Even though he had been defeated by Alexander's capture of the Sogdian fortress, Oxyartes would never have allowed the Macedonian King to get away with treating his daughter with anything less than the utmost of respect."
No comments:
Post a Comment