UN - Undermine Europe's Ethnic/Cultural Homogeneity

Hat tip to Gates of Vienna.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395

This is certainly an appropriate follow-up to yesterdays post. In that one, the ethnic and cultural identity of Swedish people were denied by some, terribly denigrated by others, and agreed by all Multiculturalists involved to be in need of absolute suppression.

In the article linked above, a UN Migration representative stated to the British House of Lords that European nations must become Multicultural. To do so, their ethnic and cultural homogeneity must be "undermined".

"He [Peter Sutherland] told the House of Lords committee migration was a "crucial dynamic for economic growth" in some EU nations "however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states". "


It is interesting that the enormous ongoing drain on national financial resources of European countries caused by rampant immigration is not taken into account.

"He told the committee: "The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.

"And that's precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.' "

In summary. Mr.Sutherland states that too many Europeans do not know that the best thing for them is to change the ethnic and cultural makeup of their nations. Since they are too ignorant and thus need to be helped, the steady rain of immigrants should be turned into a  monsoon to transform  European nations into Multicultural regions that no longer have a core group of people with similar outlooks/political tastes or any desire to maintain their national sovereignty. How dare the Danes, for example, insist that their nation have a majority of ethnic Danes?

Political writers such as Alexis de Tocqueville and Montesquieu were quite clear and correct in noting that, for republics or democracies to survive, the political base must have a sufficient degree of ethnic and cultural homogeneity. Without this, the nation can be easily pulled in different directions and lose its sense of identity.

This of course is exactly what the Left desires. Nations comprised of ethnic/cultural majorities tend to resist radical changes or any surrendering of national sovereignty to one-world or regional governments. The most simple way to remove this annoying obstacle is to change a nation's electorate. The Stalinist/Maoist/Khmer Rouge method was to kill off millions of the recalcitrants and inspire sufficient fear in the rest to keep them cooperative. The modern Multicultural method is to import massive amounts of people with cultures foreign to those of the nations that must be undermined. Once the number of the new citizens becomes a majority or otherwise reaches the minimal amount necessary for a constitutional convention, the indigenous will have no effective political power and consequently be be unable to prevent the dissolution of their national constitutions.

Multiculturalism is the modern Left's answer to the rise of the proletariat that never happened.

The German Socialist Bertolt Brecht summed up the Leftist outlook:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertolt_Brecht

"After the uprising of the 17th of June
The Secretary of the Writers Union
Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee
Stating that the people
Had forfeited the confidence of the government
And could win it back only
By redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier
In that case for the government
To dissolve the people
And elect another?"

I refuse to believe that Europeans will put up with this much longer. Their societies were built and governed by people who were fully aware of the legacy that they had to bequeath to their descendants. I just hope that the heirs realize the threats facing them before it is too late.