Thursday, June 14, 2012

Graphic Sex Descriptions Given to Fifth Graders

http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/parents-furious-after-school-teaches-5th-graders-about-oral-anal-sex.html

Hat tip to TheBlaze.


The Left hammers away again at Western Culture, and the kids are the collateral damage.

"Parents in a small Washington State community are infuriated after their 11-year-old children were given graphic descriptions of oral and anal sex during a sex education class led by an elementary school principal."

Infuriated is not the word. You will see why below. Brace yourself if you choose to read on.

Oh, by the way, the Principal is the perp in this case.

When asked by her parents what she was told in class, a 10 or 11 year-old girl recounted what her Principal told the class.

" 'You take a man’s penis and you put it in your mouth – that’s what the girls do to the boys,” their daughter told the couple. “The boys spread the girls legs apart and put their mouths down on the vaginas.' "

Since the facts speak for themselves, I will only add one comment to this. Aside from the horrifically sick content itself, the boys were told that they "spread the girl's legs apart". How does the principle pretend that the boys will not take that to mean that they are not supposed to be aggressors in such an act? Conversely, how are the girls to perceive this as anything but an implicit instruction to remain compliant when boys actually do move their legs apart?

How does a parent get a kid's innocence back after such a violation? 

So far, no disciplinary actions have been considered:

"School officials did not return calls seeking comment.

However, Superintendent Scott Fenter defended the principal’s action to local media and said that the lesson did not go too far.

“I think the principal handled it appropriately at the time; she only gave factual information, no demonstrations,” Fenter told NWCN.com. “Because in sixth grade they start becoming sexually aware and you’ve got to teach them ahead of time.' "

I tend to fix the blame on people's mindsets, general stupidity, and their political positions. In this case, I have to go with an entirely different angle.

I can't leave out the possibility that this was demonic in nature. When a patently bad act is described as good or appropriate, and this happens a lot today, it is not unlikely that a certain personality is directly involved.












2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Note that I removed one comment. Although opinions are welcome, input must reflect some degree of intelligent thought.

    ReplyDelete