http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/327086
A British Mom-to-be with an admittedly checkered past is facing moves by Social Services to take custody of her baby when it is born. Although the bureaucrats have noted their concerns with her less-than-model past, they seem to be far more focused on her affiliations with groups such as the English Defence League. The father, a British Army soldier just returned from Afghanistan, has been ruled out as a potential custodial parent by Social Services because he is an active duty soldier. This appears to be to be a very lame excuse made to ensure that neither he nor Mom can bring up the child with any sense of British identity. Thanks for fighting for us, Soldier. We'll be taking the baby and will make sure that he/she is raised as a good Multiculturalist.
In a Multiculturalist society, everyone gets to practice and advocate their culture except for those who are descended from the people who made the society what it is. These people are supposed to meekly accept that they are to be made insignificant, impotent and eventually brushed aside.
The English Defence League has been repeatedly labeled by the Leftist press in Britain as a racist group. It's leader Tommy Robinson, has successfully defended his group, often befuddling smug interviewers with his clear answers and thinking when they try their best to make him and his group look as badly as possible.
The EDL's demonstrations have been portrayed as violent, but from what I have seen and read, the vast majority of the violence at these events has been initiated by Unite Against Fascism (UAF), a group of Leftist thugs who regularly employ violence.Violent Muslims also consider the EDL and Tommy as favorite targets, and Tommy has been attacked on several occasions, including one savage episode a few months back in which he was beaten severely and hospitalized. The press tends to leave out the actions of the UAF and Muslims and generally places the blame squarely at the feet of the EDL.
The EDL has purged its ranks of racists on more than one occasion. They are, though, gravely concerned with the Islamization of the UK and the looming spectre of a loss of identity of its nation and people. Their platform is one of reasonable immigration, the necessity for newcomers to integrate, and prohibitions on the implementation of Sharia Law in their nation. I have listened to Tommy's speeches and interviews on numerous occasions and have found him to be honest and sincere. I saw one video in which he spared no profanity when ordering a Nazi-saluting (Presumably a UAF troublemaker) to put his arm down and leave the demonstration.
Here is the link to the EDL. For the moment, drop what the press has said about them and see what they say about themselves:
http://englishdefenceleague.org/about-us/mission-statement/
-From the link at top:
"Durham County Council has told Toni McLeod she would pose a “risk of significant harm” to the baby. Social workers fear the child would become radicalised with EDL views and want it put up for adoption immediately.
Mrs McLeod, who is 35 weeks pregnant, is a former leading member of the EDL, in which she was notorious as “English Angel”. The 25-year-old has a string of convictions for violence, including butting and biting a police officer after an EDL march in 2010 and she has been banned from owning dogs after setting a pit bull on a former partner.
However, her cause has been taken up by Lib Dem MP John Hemming who, despite his loathing for the EDL, raised it in the Commons. He contrasts her treatment with that of the extremist Islamic cleric Abu Qatada, who was allowed to remain with his children when he was briefly remanded on bail earlier this year as the Government tries to deport him.
He said: “It raises a curious question as to why Abu Qatada is allowed to radicalise his children but the state won’t take the chance of allowing Toni McLeod to look after her baby in case she says something social workers won’t like.
“I am very strongly opposed to the EDL, which I believe to be a racist organisation, but I do not think we should remove all of the children of the people who go on their demonstrations, however misguided they may be.”
Mrs McLeod has posted racist abuse on social networking sites but denies being racist. She claims she is no longer active with the EDL and has never been charged with violence against children.
Social workers have told her husband Martyn he would be unable to care for his child because he is a full-time soldier just back from Afghanistan."........
This is real potential trouble. When the government gets into the business of barring parents from possibly exposing their kids to verboten political views, that entity has crossed the line and is clearly engaged in a "long train of abuses". Note that the views of a political group that stands for the crime of British/English identity are the primary cause for this action. Compounding this is the fact that the same bureaucrats are routinely letting violent and hate-espousing Muslims in Britain continue having custody of their children. I am not aware of British Social Services going after those who advocate Islamic rule in Britain (And there are many of those) nor have I read of the same civil servants taking much action against those who subject their daughters to female genital mutilation or commit gang rapes against indigenous British girls.
This is a really good way to get the rank-and-file soldiery more than slightly steamed at the government that they protect with their lives.
"Multicultural Britain is becoming an ever more sinister country in which to live. I am pretty much immune to the totalitarian ideology of multiculturalism, but having said that, even I must confess to being shocked that the British state can now kidnap babies and children simply because their parents question the dictatorial and wholly unnatural orthodoxy of the ruling elites.
All in all, [she is] not the best qualifications for motherhood, but these are not the reasons behind the state sanctioned child-snatching. Ms McLeod has been presumed guilty of a far more serious crime than simply living her life as a result of liberalism’s catastrophic progressive policies.
Ms McLeod you see, is deemed a racist — and quite possibly a fascist to boot — both of which are ranked nowadays as the ultimate evil by the promoters of multiculturalism, who are trying desperately to hold together Britain’s rapidly fragmenting and fantastical multicultural Utopia.
Snatching children from parents who hold “inappropriate” political views is nothing new, although it normally requires a fully totalitarian state such as Nazi Germany or Communist Russia in order to be effected. I hope I am not alone in recognising how deeply sinister and frightening multicultural Britain has become when it seeks to emulate the ideology of such dictatorships.
Polls conducted in the 1960s and ’70s suggest the overwhelming majority of British citizens were opposed to mass immigration. Recent polls in Britain and Europe suggest the indigenous citizens have a very rational fear of Islam, despite the ruling elite’s dictatorial attempts to portray this violent and supremacist political ideology as a fuzzy and moderate religion of peace.
Multicultural Britain is now at a very dangerous crossroads. The liberal/left have implemented the wholly unnatural act of diluting the cohesive native population with an imported population which comes from a society completely at odds with the religion, tradition and culture of Great Britain. This alien society is then actively encouraged to retain its barbaric culture rather than assimilate.
Not content with simply causing social division and facilitating religious terrorism, the liberal/left then engage in persecuting and criminalising any member of the native population who dares question their perverse and treacherous ideology. The problem here is that there are tens-of-millions of people who do question their ideology, so multiculturally Apartheid Britain is set to become increasingly dictatorial as our liberal elites move to quash the dissidents.
The sheer insanity of multiculturalism throws up any number of contradictions and ironies. Ms McLeod’s partner and father of the soon-to-be-snatched-baby is a serving soldier in Afghanistan. The state will reward him with a campaign medal for doing his bit in fighting Islamism abroad, whilst the self-same state will steal his child because the mother is fighting Islamism at home. If this is not insane then I don’t know what is."
However, her cause has been taken up by Lib Dem MP John Hemming who, despite his loathing for the EDL, raised it in the Commons. He contrasts her treatment with that of the extremist Islamic cleric Abu Qatada, who was allowed to remain with his children when he was briefly remanded on bail earlier this year as the Government tries to deport him.
He said: “It raises a curious question as to why Abu Qatada is allowed to radicalise his children but the state won’t take the chance of allowing Toni McLeod to look after her baby in case she says something social workers won’t like.
“I am very strongly opposed to the EDL, which I believe to be a racist organisation, but I do not think we should remove all of the children of the people who go on their demonstrations, however misguided they may be.”
Mrs McLeod has posted racist abuse on social networking sites but denies being racist. She claims she is no longer active with the EDL and has never been charged with violence against children.
Social workers have told her husband Martyn he would be unable to care for his child because he is a full-time soldier just back from Afghanistan."........
This is real potential trouble. When the government gets into the business of barring parents from possibly exposing their kids to verboten political views, that entity has crossed the line and is clearly engaged in a "long train of abuses". Note that the views of a political group that stands for the crime of British/English identity are the primary cause for this action. Compounding this is the fact that the same bureaucrats are routinely letting violent and hate-espousing Muslims in Britain continue having custody of their children. I am not aware of British Social Services going after those who advocate Islamic rule in Britain (And there are many of those) nor have I read of the same civil servants taking much action against those who subject their daughters to female genital mutilation or commit gang rapes against indigenous British girls.
This is clearly designed to frighten others away from even considering taking a stand for the identity of their nation and the freedoms bequeathed to them by their ancestors. Those who have been affiliated with any targeted groups will get the picture - if you want to keep your kids, abandon any ties that you may have or had with any group that expresses concern with the submerging of British identity.
This is a really good way to get the rank-and-file soldiery more than slightly steamed at the government that they protect with their lives.
-Excerpts from a post by Paul Weston in Gates of Vienna below:
All in all, [she is] not the best qualifications for motherhood, but these are not the reasons behind the state sanctioned child-snatching. Ms McLeod has been presumed guilty of a far more serious crime than simply living her life as a result of liberalism’s catastrophic progressive policies.
Ms McLeod you see, is deemed a racist — and quite possibly a fascist to boot — both of which are ranked nowadays as the ultimate evil by the promoters of multiculturalism, who are trying desperately to hold together Britain’s rapidly fragmenting and fantastical multicultural Utopia.
Snatching children from parents who hold “inappropriate” political views is nothing new, although it normally requires a fully totalitarian state such as Nazi Germany or Communist Russia in order to be effected. I hope I am not alone in recognising how deeply sinister and frightening multicultural Britain has become when it seeks to emulate the ideology of such dictatorships.
Polls conducted in the 1960s and ’70s suggest the overwhelming majority of British citizens were opposed to mass immigration. Recent polls in Britain and Europe suggest the indigenous citizens have a very rational fear of Islam, despite the ruling elite’s dictatorial attempts to portray this violent and supremacist political ideology as a fuzzy and moderate religion of peace.
Multicultural Britain is now at a very dangerous crossroads. The liberal/left have implemented the wholly unnatural act of diluting the cohesive native population with an imported population which comes from a society completely at odds with the religion, tradition and culture of Great Britain. This alien society is then actively encouraged to retain its barbaric culture rather than assimilate.
Not content with simply causing social division and facilitating religious terrorism, the liberal/left then engage in persecuting and criminalising any member of the native population who dares question their perverse and treacherous ideology. The problem here is that there are tens-of-millions of people who do question their ideology, so multiculturally Apartheid Britain is set to become increasingly dictatorial as our liberal elites move to quash the dissidents.
The sheer insanity of multiculturalism throws up any number of contradictions and ironies. Ms McLeod’s partner and father of the soon-to-be-snatched-baby is a serving soldier in Afghanistan. The state will reward him with a campaign medal for doing his bit in fighting Islamism abroad, whilst the self-same state will steal his child because the mother is fighting Islamism at home. If this is not insane then I don’t know what is."
No comments:
Post a Comment