Retired NASA Scientists/Engineers - Global Warming Not a Threat

When scientists or an engineers are courageous enough to speak out against the lie of global warming, the Left will either howl in protest, gang up to ridicule and blacklist them, or effectively cover up their statements by ignoring them.

Belief in the threat of global warming has reached a status that than only be compared to that of followers of a cult. An Inconvenient Truth is viewed and believed with no questions asked. The faithful  have been told all sorts of horror stories, and these have been accepted with the trusting nature of a young child. So far has this cult-following gone that the masseuse who claimed that Al Gore sexually assaulted her reported that friends suggested she refrain from getting him in trouble since he was one of the few who was doing anything to save the world from rising oceans, droughts, and other fictional consequences.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1291661/A-inconvenient-masseuse-How-saint-Al-Gore-sanctimonious-eco-crusader-lost-halo-wife.html

"....She says some of her Left-wing friends (whom she describes as 'the Birkenstock tribe' after the hippy sandals beloved of liberals) advised against telling police. One warned her that she should forget it - 'otherwise, the world's going to be destroyed from global warming'....."


Global warming is a scheme created by a cabal of Western Socialists and radical environmentalists to impoverish Western nations by forcing them to pay for "Carbon Credits" for the crime of releasing molecules that plants use for respiration. This system starts off with the patently false assumption that carbon dioxide is a pollutant. The monies paid for these credits will raise the cost of goods produced in developed nations (the ones that are not granted exemptions) and enrich crooks such as Al Gore who have a lot of money invested in the dispensing of the credits. The rest of the revenue will ostensibly be sent to underdeveloped nations so that they can get a hand up on developed nations, but will likely wind up in the pockets of corrupt UN officials.

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/03/08/Earth-is-safe-from-global-warming-say-the-men-who-put-man-on-the-moon

"The planet is not in danger of catastrophic man made global warming. Even if we burn all the world's recoverable fossil fuels it will still only result in a temperature rise of less than 1.2 degrees C.

So say The Right Climate Stuff Research Team, a group of retired NASA Apollo scientists and engineers - the men who put Neil Armstrong on the moon - in a new report.

"It's an embarrassment to those of us who put NASA's name on the map to have people like James Hansen popping off about global warming," says the project's leader Hal Doiron.

Doiron was one of 40 ex NASA employees - including seven astronauts - who wrote in April 2012 to NASA administrator Charles Bolden protesting about the organization's promotion of climate change alarmism, notably via its resident environmental activist James Hansen.
During his stint as head of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Hansen tirelessly promoted Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. He retired last year to spend more time on environmental campaigning and has twice been arrested with former mermaid impersonator Darryl Hannah for his part in protests against surface coal mining and the Keystone XL pipe line. While still head of NASA GISS he once described trains carrying coal as "death trains" "no less gruesome than if they were carrying boxcars headed to crematoria and loaded with uncountable irreplaceable species." Many NASA employees and former employees found his views an embarrassment.

Doiron and his team now hope to set the record straight in a report called Bounding GHG Climate Sensitivity For Use In Regulatory Decisions.

Using calculations by George Stegemeier of the National Academy of Engineering, they estimated the total quantity of recoverable oil, gas and coal on the planet. They then used 163 years of real world temperature data to calculate Transient Climate Sensitivity (ie how much the world will warm as a result of the burning of all the carbon dioxide in the fossil fuel). The figure they came up with 1.2 degrees C which is considerably lower than the wilder claims of the IPCC, whose reports have suggested it could be as high as 4 degrees C or more.
This is because, as scientists such as the Cato Institute's Pat Michaels have long argued, "climate sensitivity" (ie how the planet's temperature responds to CO2 emissions) is considerably lower than the IPCC's computer models project. So much so that it should be called "climate insensitivity", he believes..............

There is no empirical data indicating Anthropogenic Global Warming will produce catastrophic climate changes. AGW can only produce modest global warming, likely to be beneficial when CO2 benefits to crop production are considered............"