Sunday, June 30, 2013

Syrian Rebels Behead Priest - Insanity Prevails in US

The world is fact becoming fully unglued.

The main part of California's Proposition 8 gets overturned by the Supreme Court, yet we keep reading opinions that the Court is telling us that marriage laws are the domain of individual states. If someone can help me here I would appreciate it - If the Court held that marriage laws are supposed to be handled by the states, why (Or how) did the same Court- simultaneously, strike down a state law on marriage?

[I was sent the following post with an explanation. As those who were responsible for defending the law refused do so*, those who did defend it before the Court were held not to have proper standing, so the appeal was dismissed. The whole thing looked like a set-up from the beginning. A referendum, having been put to vote and passed by the people, is subsequently ignored by the elected and appointed officials of that same state.]

In Florida, atheists betrayed their patently incurious and  anti-intellectual attitude (Not by unveiling their monument to atheism which was placed next to one on the Ten Commandments, which was bad enough) by their choice of "proof" to support their position that Judeo-Christian belief and thought had no place in the founding of our nation. Their choice of quotes for the front of the monument  was probably the worst one possible. It came from the period of the attacks on American shipping by the Islamic pirates of the Barbary Coast:

"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries." 

Did even one of the atheists on the (Presumed) committee to design the monument even consider the circumstances under which this statement was put into the treaty with the piratical Tripolitanian state? A cursory reading of the history of our conflict and wars with the Barbary states would make that clear - these were Islamic states. Their emissaries of that time made it painfully clear that they preyed on non-Muslim nations because the Koran decreed such practices to be, if anythingmandatory. The US, then having no deep-water fleet that could be deployed that far away and for any length of time, needed to buy the practical states off with tribute money. In order to detach our nation as much as possible from the label as a Christian nation, John Adams needed to make sure that the treaty itself (Which would be signed by the Pasha or his representative) had specific language that took any talk of Christianity out of the picture and made the extortion-inspired bargaining purely about money. 

Atheists never cease to amaze me with their ignorance. They actually spent money on a monument that has a quote that was - beyond a shadow of a doubt, only written to make it easier for us to negotiate tribute prices with a piratical state. If one desires to win an argument or just make a point, which I assume these atheists wanted to to, he doesn't utilize statements made by people when under any form of duress. It does nothing to prove their point. 

John Adams also said this:

"...Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people."

In Syria, the rebels have stormed a monastery and promptly went to work beheading people (Islamic style - with a knife, not a sword or an ax), the first one of them being a Catholic priest, all before a cheering group of men and boys.

"....In video posted by Live Leak purporting to show the execution, dozens of men and boys are seen cheering on as three men are seated on the ground awaiting their grisly fate.

The men are methodically beheaded one at a time by men holding what appears to be a simple kitchen knife after which the heads are placed on top of the bodies.

According to Catholic Online, the first victim was Murad.
[The priest]

A frenzy ensues, with dozens drawing out their smartphones to capture the bloody scene, as a chorus of Allahu Akbar (“Allah is the greatest”) are sung with jihadi rapture. Several observers are seen moving within inches of the bodies in an effort to capture close-up photos.
Catholic Online is raising alarm that western nations are providing support to the rebels who have shown a proclivity toward persecuting Christians:

'This should make it clear to Christians around the world what jihadists are about. Make no mistake. Catholics and Christians around the globe are under dire threat, particularly from the spread of militant Islam. Until the threat is recognized and taken seriously, martyrdoms like this will continue.'........"

-and the US is feeding weapons to these people via Jordan:

When is the US going to stop assisting the rebels? They claim that Assad employed chemical weapons, but we have been given no real evidence other than the word of the Obama administration, which by its very nature is less than dubious. Even if they did, we can still say that the Syrian army has not gone about attacking Christian communities and beheading people. 

The US is a nation in which Christianity has, if not a clear majority of adherents, at least a definite plurality. The US also has a solid history of Christian belief, yet our money is being used to arm thugs who murder innocent people, many of whom are coreligionists with the bulk of the citizenry of the US.

The administration is  not going to stop unless we put the full-court press on them. Representatives and Senators must be called to encourage them to step up and call for an end to this ongoing evil. This has got to stop.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Western Socialism - The Managerial Elite

For a long time, I was unfamiliar with the term "Event Cascade". In trying to come up with a brief description of what happens in a dysfunctional organization, family, or state, I attempted to modify an older phrase into "Chains of Events" to explain how the repeated ignoring of problems, failures to follow common-sense polices and practices, introduction by power-hungry managers of controlling practices that restrict employees from doing their jobs, and a culture that makes people fearful of speaking out about current and predicted crises come together to virtually guarantee either repeated day-to-day or catastrophic operational failures. It was only after reading about the Fukushima disaster that I encountered the term Event Cascade. Procedures must be followed and periodically reevaluated, and if employees and low-level managers have have no ability to address wrongful acts or omissions , the system will have problems that could easily have been avoided

A similar thing occurred when I was attempting to find a phrase to describe the type of ruling elite that has taken over the West. 

Forgive me for generalizing here on early governments:

Some early societies relied on the strongest and least abusive to make key decisions for the group. In time, deference would often be given to Elders. As civilized agricultural communities arose, we see the priest-king ruling over a large body of workers. That would change in time to effect a split between the kings and the priests. Smaller city-states such as those of Greece or Rome spread out the ruling power among those who owned (And were allowed to own) property, creating either Republics or true Democracies. factors such as widespread speculation and slavery eventually turned the former small landowner into a city-dwelling welfare recipient. Other early Western Cultures such as the Celts, Germans, and Macedonians, had a king that was not much more than a head of the leading men. The ancient Hebrew society had elements that were a mixture of tribal and republican (With a later addition of Kingship). Some "Republics" such as that f Venice and Russian principalities, were actually oligarchies, with a select few families wielding power. In large empires (Chinese, Byzantine, Persian), the governmental machinery brought the non-aristocratic bureaucrat onto the scene. With the inevitable collapse of Roman society and government in the West, that part of Europe saw the long rule of the nobility; with the Church often providing the closest thing to a real governmental structure and the peasant being less than an also-ran.

As the money economy returned to Western Europe, the bourgeois (Burger, Burgos, etc.) class gained greater amounts of power, eventually reducing and in some cases eliminating the power of the nobility.

There followed the big bankers and large-scale industrialists, who incited world wars for their profit and to this day exercise a massive amount of influence in world affairs. It is ironic that the very power-brokers who first played nations off against each other to make money now work to eliminate sovereign nations entirely in order to make money more easily.

With the advent of Marxism, probably the most anti-intellectual short-sighted solution ever to arise (The worst of the Industrial Revolution was but a blip on the radar of world history and on no way necessitated the transformation of the world population), the intellectual, or rather the pseudo-intellectual gained prominence.

From this point, the individual who had likely contributed the least to society in the way of taxes, consumption of goods, parenthood (raising children well is a tremendous gift to society) , military service, real volunteer work (that actually helps people), or any other tangible or intangible contribution would be the decision-maker. The more time that was spent in the classroom, at the Progressive and Leftist press and think-tanks, and in the party headquarters, would be the one who got positions of power and influence in the New Order.

This system, of course collapsed, everywhere and far faster than Athens, Sparta, the Roman Republic and Empire, the US (We had a good run but are facing the end), and the large empires of history, die-hard Marxists needed a new way to make their agenda "work".

I have previously mentioned Cultural Marxism, the baby of Leftists such as Antonio Gramcsi and Georg Lukaks, and Frankfurt School, from which this strategy was launched; undermine all of the Culture of the West, religion, patriotism, ethnic and cultural identity and pride (Including the disparagement of all noble aspects and history of Western Civilization) , the family, and the table is set for the creation of a Socialism that has no non-Socialist rival to run it out of business as what eventually happened  to the USSR.

But what to call the actual ruling elite of Western Socialism?

We can't simply call them Marxists as they are partnered with the banks and the industrialists - "they" being the Leftists who from policy and act in unison to drive all pockets of opposition underground. Academics, journalists, radical environmentalists and atheists, coalitions of gay/lesbians, gratuitous abortion and 'tell 12 year-olds to have sex' lobbies - these are the ones who drive the vehicles of policy.

And I am embarrassed to admit that I never came across a term, nor coined one to my satisfaction, to label them.

Until today, when I read a dug a little deeper on James Burnham.

He was a former Trotskyite, who eventually fled that world of lies for Conservatism*. In his early works, he describes what he refers to as the "Managerial Revolution" The rule of the Managerial Elite.

For example, the Elite would not eliminate private property, but it would eliminate your rights to manage it as you desire.

Think about what follows in our world - The "Managers" would not legislate the family out of existence, but they would certainly marginalize the parents into the status of  full-time babysitters with no real authority. Every aspect of our society would be either run or heavily influenced by the "Managers". Teachers,college professors, large corporations that desire more regulation to run small business out of competition, the Sierra Club, the Club of Rome, the Bilderberg Group, NARAL, Radical gay "rights" groups, advocates of anti-White college courses such as "Critical Theory", "Whiteness Studies or "White Privilege", radical environmentalists and animal rights advocates who call for allowing attorneys to bring suit on behalf animals that would be legally recognized as "persons", and all other special interest groups would function as "Managers" - working together to slowly tighten the noose around the neck of a formerly  free society as they bring about a variant of Socialism that is far filthier, uglier, and immoral than that of the former USSR.

It's late and I am exhausted from cutting back all shrubs and branches in my yard, but I now have a term to use to describe who runs the show now, and all this time I had James Burnham to thank - if only I has read more about him earlier.

*He later (In 1964 - after his conversion) wrote the Suicide of the West, which is now going to the top of my reading list.

Friday, June 28, 2013

More Anti-White Hatred Exposed by Zimmerman Trial

Paula Deen not only lost her job (And all related book contracts/endorsements for using the N-word a long time ago, she also faced to the wrath of the media-baited mob.

When whites are the target*, that's a horse of a different color (No pun intended).

-From The Blaze:

(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)

(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)

(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)

(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)

(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)

(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)

(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)

(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)

My counting may have been off, but I have seven comments that mention murdering innocent and non-black  people in the event that George Zimmerman is found Not Guilty.

The media will ignore this, just as they ignored the vast majority of the "This is for Trayvon" attacks on whites  that followed the shooting.

The establishment is afraid of the consequences anti-white hatred that they have cultivated. People have to live in fear of being attacked if the verdict on which the mob insists is not reached.

Referring to legislative play-acting to desecrate marriage as a "right", invoking Jesus or the Father to support the same, telling our kids to start having sex as soon that they "feel ready", making abortions akin to an oil change at a service station, paying doctors to kill you, taking the position that failing to own and be proficient with a firearm is not a refusal to meet a basic civic obligation but actually an honorable deed, bad-mouthing every noble individual and event from our History, living your entire life at the expense of taxpayers, asserting that a nation has no authority to decide who can live within its borders, claiming that the military discriminates against women for protecting its enemy-killing capacity, eviscerating any Black American who refuses to accept the lot assigned to him by the Left, adopting school programs that make functional illiteracy a success,   allowing one lawsuit after another by rabid atheists to remove symbols that recall the contributions of religion to our society,......

We are two totally different countries. The sooner that we realize that, the better. 



Thursday, June 27, 2013

Magna Carta is Dead in England

In the UK, you will be allowed to enter the country despite the fact that you habitually spew whatever words of hatred that you wish.

-As long as you are a Muslim.

If you are careful to differentiate between Muslim people and the hatred, violence, and subjection of women and non-Muslims that is promoted in the Koran and other Islamic writings, however, you will be prohibited from entering the nation.

-From the first link:

"In a not unexpected — but nevertheless shocking — move, Britain’s Home Office has denied entry into the UK to Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller. The two anti-sharia advocates had planned to join Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll this weekend in laying flowers at the site of Lee Rigby’s* murder in Woolwich, in honor of Armed Forces Day.

Unlike Geert Wilders at the time he was denied entry to Britain, Mr. Spencer and Ms. Geller are not on trial for “inciting hatred”. They have never been convicted of any crimes. They have never incited violence in any way. Their only “offense” has been to speak out repeatedly against Islamization and the dangers of Shariah......."

-From the fourth link:

"Devotion to jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls, and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer. Allah said that if a man fights the infidels, the infidels will be unable to prepare to fight."
"You may be wondering if it was I
[Robert Spencer] or Pamela Geller who penned that hate-filled misrepresentation of the beautiful Islamic doctrine of jihad. But in fact, it was neither one of us. It was Mohammed al-Arefe, a Saudi Muslim cleric who believes that shedding Infidel blood and smashing Infidel skulls is pleasing to his god.

Apparently believing that such violence is an Islamic imperative is just fine with the British Home Office as long as one does so approvingly: Mohammed al-Arefe was just last week admitted into Britainwithout any difficulty. If one believes that such violence is an Islamic imperative but opposes it, however, watch out: that is not conducive to the public good....."

-From the second link:

"The backgrounds of the two banned Americans [Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller] were reviewed by the Home Secretary’s office and they were told in crystal clear terms, “your presence here is not conducive to the public good.”

The official notice went on to clarify, ”You are therefore instructed not to travel to the UK as you will be refused admission on arrival.”...."

Although modern Leftist revisionists (As they have with the Roman revolt against the Tarquins and virtually every other crucial victory for Liberty and the Rule of Law in Western History) have taken great paints to portray the event that occurred at Runnymede in 1215 as the mere work of aristocrats working to better their positions, the Magna Carta is indisputably a key event in the development of freedom in the West. We find nothing even remotely comparable in early, contemporary, or modern civilizations in  East or South Asia, the Islamic world, or the Americas. 

One of the main points to note about the Charter was that rulers are also subject to the Law and that they have no authority to make arbitrary decisions. Everyone must be treated equally under the Law.

The nation that gave us that legal precedent, jurists such as Sir William Blackstone, political thinkers such as John Locke and Edmund Burke, and piles of examples of stubborn stands for Liberty, is - like the US, no longer recognizable. Islamists who foment hatred of Jews, Christianity, Western Culture, even the UK itself, are free to enter that nation, but someone who works to inform people about the truth of Islam are barred from doing the same. 

You cant even talk about what Muslims say about their own religion.

Those who stood against the arbitrary rule of King John and defended Liberty against the King's ensuing reactionary moves must be rolling over in their graves. 

In the 20th century, the Left (Like it did with all Western counties) needed to change British society, but their  public school and media machines were not doing the job quickly enough to suit their tastes. They needed to get the electorate turned around before the realization that Leftism is a patent lie set in among the people. The solution was to import as many non-Western immigrants as possible. A key part of this strategy was to include massive amounts of immigrants from Muslim nations. Not only do Muslims vote for Liberal/Labor parties, they also would have,  as Islam is pan-national in its outlook, no appreciation for British sovereignty. Socialists want to do away with national boundaries, so Muslims would serve two purposes.

The plan, save for a few minor hiccups such as plagues of gang rapes of indigenous British girls, a massive increase in violent crime, widespread welfare fraud, the steady advancing of Sharia Law, and large-scale rioting, has worked out fairly well for the Left - even "Conservative" politicians have to ignore the facts and play down the effects of this policy if they want to keep their cushy jobs.

Now the Left and their so-called Conservative opponents have a tricky job; the mob will turn out for any event that the Muslims can use to justify yet more violence, so the politicians from both sides have to pander to them. 

As with most solutions to inherently wrongful policies, what has been implemented is a sub-policy of applying bandages - not to fix the problem, but to put a temporary stop to the bleeding. Those who work to protect the national and ethnic culture of the people of the UK, as well as anyone who dares to speak accurately about Islam, are either subjected to continual harassment by the authorities or left alone to be attacked by Leftists thugs such as those if Unite Against Fascism. If one who does the same  is a citizen of another nation,  he or she will be prevented even from visiting the UK.

The people of Western nations have precious little time left before it will be too late to save even a remnant of their respective countries. They can no longer turn a blind eye to what is being done to enslave their descendants. If the Left is not checked soon, the people will have to pack up and leave if they want to have a place to live in Freedom and in the spirit of their ancestors**.

We will have to consider a modern-day Volkerwanderung.

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Reveling in our Iniquities While Christians Are Murdered

As many enthusiastically celebrated another nail in the coffin being hammered in by the Supreme Court with the gutting of Proposition 8,  Boko Haram was hard at work slaughtering Christians.

"LAGOS, Nigeria (TheBlaze/AP) — The pastor would not renounce his Christian faith so the Islamic extremists slit his throat.

High school students were taking exams in defiance of the militants of Boko Haram, whose name means “Western education is forbidden.” So the gunmen mowed them down at their desks.

The group that Nigeria’s government has declared a prohibited terrorist organization “declared war” last week on vigilante youths who have been arresting suspects and handing them over to soldiers fighting to crush the insurgency in the northeast part of Africa’s most populous nation and the continent’s biggest oil producer.

Clearly, the situation is dire.

The radical group that once attacked only government institutions and security forces is increasingly targeting civilians. Some 155,000 square kilometers (60,000 square miles) of Nigeria are now under a state of emergency......"

Our society has become fully polarized. One side maintains a coalition of Leftists, wreckers of morality and sacred institutions, those who grant dangerous powers to the government*, eugenicists who laud slaughtering the unborn and ourselves, along with other assorted  iconoclasts, and the other stands by largely silent and afraid to act as the edifice is readied to collapse on its undermined foundation.

In Nigeria, as with other Muslim-majority nations, Christians do not have the option of shaking their fist at God, their Culture, or a society's most important institution - they are too concerned with protecting their own lives.

Not that I want our children to be faced with the threat of violence in their day-to-day lives, but I have come to hold that, the longer a society gets to enjoy living in safety and peace, the more open it is to either engaging in inherently wrongful activity or just doing nothing while others commits the acts of destruction. 

In the end, the people will be fully enervated and so lacking in virtue that they will no longer be able to defend themselves from any invader, nor will they be able to endure a change to the easy and prosperous life to which they have grown accustomed. 

We are setting ourselves up for a very big fall.

We have two completely different societies in this nation, and one will not only refuse to yield on any issue, it will insist that those on the other side accept every new demand. They will not stop - Churches will (For one example) soon be targeted for refusing to officiate for fake marriages. 

We will have to divorce one society from the other. Let them have their half to run they way they wish. The nation can no longer maintain this charade of unity. 

* -When a people decides that a government has right-making powers, a dangerous precedent is set. A body that can grant rights can, by extension, take rights away:

".....Marriage existed as an institution long, long before any governments were ever created. Therefore, governments can only, like they do with private property, regulate and protect it. Laws can be made to bar people from marrying others before a divorce, at too young an age, if too closely related, or prohibit polygamy/polyandry (And even close relations and the latter technically may be argued to be beyond the pale of government control), but they have no authority to redefine marriage. To declare that one exists when it does not means that the State has effectively codified fake marriages....."

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Putin - "Nyet" to Snowden Extradition

"U.S. officials on Tuesday challenged Russian President Vladimir Putin's claim that Moscow's hands are tied when it comes to NSA leaker Edward Snowden, saying there is a "clear legal basis" to turn him over.

Putin confirmed earlier Tuesday that Snowden is at the Moscow airport. He said, though, that not only is Snowden in the transit zone, but since Snowden has not committed a crime in Russia, the government will not extradite him back -- as requested -- to the United States......"

The Chinese made their move in a classic East Asian fashion, stalling for time as they made vague statements about 
clarifications on the minutia of the US request for Snowden's detention and eventual extradition.

The Russians, being of a culture that prefers straightforward or blunt answers, did not bother to engage in  courtly Diplospeak - Putin basically said 'Yea, we're not doing that'.

While I freely admit that we don't, nor may we ever, know for certain why Edward Snowden performed his intel leak, it is looking worse for the US.

I am still of the impression that he did what he believed had to be done.

Snowden was accused by many of having been in bed with the Chinese, but he was not the recipient of asylum in that nation, so the claim appears to be weak. He also has not been whisked away to a nation in which asylum has been guaranteed, which makes the accusations look like little more than sour grapes on the part of the Obama administration and the State Department.

What we have now is a US President and his State Department having to face what History will tell our descendants was in fact inevitable - a buffoon and his minions being exposed for the incompetents that they are. 

In a modern twist of Humpty-Dumpty, all the teleprompter speeches of the President and all the foot-stomping of John Kerry will not change the mind of Vladimir Putin.

One comment on the second link had a good point; a "Choom Gang" slacker that was carried throughout his college career and was the prime example of a candidate that was "made" by the media* (The latter was mine), is not in the same league as a man who rose through the ranks of the old KGB and is able to assert control over the rough and sometimes-tumultuous political world of Russia.

Barry is outclassed, plain and simple.

-From a previous post:
*While watching the 2004 election results, the network that I had on (I can't recall which one) of course moved back and forth from the Bush/Kerry contest to those for Senators and Representatives across the nation. At one point, it was emblazoned on the TV screen that OBAMA wins the Illinois Senate race. That is how the name actually looked on the screen while other winners had much smaller print. The name was repeatedly thrown at us in the same fashion several times and was of course eagerly discussed. I could not help but see that something was going on. With all sorts of seats in the Capitol Building up for grabs, this one single race was somehow a big deal. I could not recall any appreciable news stories concerning the campaign for that particular seat. It did not make any sense unless the individual involved was somehow supposed to be larger than life. His name was patently being treated as if it had been a household word for years. The use of the name was clearly intended to convey a sense of power, electricity, and as a force in and of itself. I was reminded of the personality cults of Mao, Stalin, Lenin, and others. The face, the name, and the created imagery were all there.

I thought to myself that this was the guy that the Democrats wanted for 2012. I was wrong - in 2008, he was given a Roman Triumph of a lift by the media and others simply for being a guy that was just so great that things could not but improve.

Monday, June 24, 2013

Whom Does the US Support in Syria?

As the US, without showing any proof, assures the world that we have evidence that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons*(At bottom), we continually get reminded about what the mindset of the other side (See above).

-But what the other guys are doing are of no concern to the Obama administration.

The rebel forces appear to be overwhelmingly Sunni Muslim (The guys that we were always told were the nice Muslims - Shiites being the supposed bad ones), but the argument can be made that the government has a broader type of coalition:

"The new-found efficiency of Mr Assad’s men may owe a lot to his Iranian advisers. Armoured units of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and other regular troops fought alongside Syria’s recently formed National Defence Force, welded together from so-called “popular committees” of pro-regime paramilitary shabiha and trained by Iran’s elite Quds Force. As well as about 6,000 regime soldiers, some 2,000 fighters from Hizbullah, the Lebanese Shia party-cum-militia that is sponsored by Iran, were thrown into the battle.

For all the West’s attempts to create diplomatic momentum before the planned peace conference in Geneva, incentives for Mr Assad to compromise may diminish thanks to events on the battlefield. After the fall of Qusayr he may believe still more strongly that he can hold out and perhaps even vanquish the revolt. State media hailed the fall of the town as the first step in the reconquest of rebel-held territory. “The solution is the army, not dialogue,” said Dareen Nusra, a housewife in Damascus....."

The pro-government forces, although not the nicest guys themselves, at least seem to be somewhat representative of the different religious and ethnic groups of that nation. Alawites, Druze, and Shiiites have more than enough to fear from full-blown Sunni rule - the plague of Shiite mosque bombings in post-war Iraq leave no room for doubt there, and Christians had a least a measure of protection prior to the launching of of the  Syrian theater of the Arab Spring. Sunni Muslims who fear being unable to live as moderates in a Islamist-run state also have no desire for seeing the rebels win this war.

So the US, being beacon of freedom and a supporter of the rights of peoples to live free and in the manner of their choosing, should be rooting for the side with the broader representation, right?

As I noted in earlier posts, the US and the EU can't both be as foolish as to sincerely believe that the Near and Middle East would be a better place if autocratic regimes were run out of town, and they certainly can't be of the impression that the West will benefit from this move.

Let's hear what General Wesley Clark had to say about the intentions of US leaders that go back to the G.W. Bush administration:

".....we're gonna take out seven countries in five years"

For what?

Western democracies can no longer be described as being moved by "unseen forces". What the US and the EU are doing is the same thing that it occurring in Western Europe itself; the turning over of large potions of the world to a socio-political religion that by its very nature knows nothing of political boundaries. EU nations have imported vast amounts of Muslim immigrants, who will almost to a one identify themselves by their religion and not as Dutch or Swedish. In my wildest dreams, I could not imagine more than 1% of them having any problem with the final dissolution of what it left of national sovereignty in European countries. In the US, we are doing the same by preparing to make 11 million-plus illegal aliens (Who also have little real affection for what the US is) into ready-made Democrats. Nation-states in the Near and Middle East have been targeted for destruction; a new mega-battleground in which the Muslims Brotherhood and other Islamist groups will jockey for position in creating a new Caliphate. 

A restored Caliphate, or a strong confederacy of Islamic regions with not national boundaries, is exactly what the Left would want - an example that should be followed by all regions in the world. If they can't get one-world government, they will back the closest thing to it. Europe under full rule of the EU, the US at best a member of  a North American union, a Sino-led Greater east Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, and so on.

If Syria does fall (Though it is looking better for Syria now that it was last year), a country that has its own real, ancient, and pre-Arabic history will have gone down the tubes (Aside from 1,400 years of an Arab presence, Syrians are not even technically Arabs). Cultures that date back far before the Christian era will be submerged until they are but the smallest remnants, lost in a sea of stagnating Islam.

At this point, it looks as if only the US and the EU can give the rebels the grease that they need to win. Let's hope that a more assertive Russia uses her influence to keep that from happening.

Sunday, June 23, 2013

Gang rape of Ethnic Norwegian Woman

Another verse of the same song 

- Colin McEvedy

"Woman raped by several men

The woman was taken away in an ambulance. “She was injured and collapsed,” says one witness

Police were notified of the incident at 3.11 PM. Ambulance and police personnel were immediately dispatched to the scene.

“The woman has told us that she was raped by several foreign men approximately 35 minutes before we were notified of the incident,” says Erik Gjesdal, leader of operations in Hordaland police district, to Bergens Tidende[local newspaper].

“The woman was in a terrible condition and it was obvious that she was very distressed,” says the chief detective at the scene........

Worst case that I’ve ever seen”

“Suddenly I saw this woman come walking towards us. She was terrified, trying to run, but then collapsed. It was obvious that she was injured. She was crying, shivering and her teeth were chattering. She was in a state of shock and I was worried that she was going to lose consciousness,” says the woman, who wants to remain anonymous.

“I had to partially restrain her because she wanted to get up and run away. I saw blood, bruises and traces of sharp objects on her body This is the worst case that I have seen in my twenty years as a nurse,” she says.........."

Nurses, like cops firefighters and ambulance technicians, see a lot of awful things. When a nurse states describes something as the worst case that she has ever seen, you can safely say that it's bad.

Although the ethnic group(s) or religion of the attackers has not been verified, one can note with reasonable certainty that they were not Norwegian, Mexican, or Italian. As noted below, almost 100% of rapes committed against native Europeans females are committed by Muslims.  Muslim immigrants are waging a war of conquest in Western Europe. While men are often robbed and beaten, the indigenous females are the preferred target. 

I think a re-post from last year would fit most properly for this abominable subject:

That victim was also Norwegian.

The above link contains details of a brutal rape and knife attack in Oslo. I have read dozens of accounts of these events that are becoming ever more frequent, but they don't get any easier to read. Media in nations such as these deliberately refrain from naming the Ethnic or cultural group of criminals but, considering the recent patterns and the fact that they threatened the victim in English (Not Norwegian), combined with the fact that almost every single rape case an ethnic Norwegian has been committed by a Muslim (or Muslims) in the past few years, I submit that it is more than likely that the attackers were those who, we are told, bring "Cultural Enrichment" to European nations.

The overwhelming amount (Almost 100%) of sexual crimes in nations such as Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, with a highly disproportionate amount in France, The Netherlands, Germany, and Britain, are being committed by Muslim men. Indigenous European (Notice that Europeans never get to be indigenous and by extension have rights?) young women and girls constitute the overwhelming number of victims of these crimes. So, if you have not guessed by this point, there is a wave of sexual assaults in these nations and very few victims are Muslim women and almost none of the rapists are Indigenous European males.

As I have noted in other posts, Islam is a socio-political system in addition to a religion. This system codifies the constant state of warfare between those of the House of Islam and those of the House of War, which is everyone who is not a Muslim or at least subjugated by Islamic rule.

This system makes the taking of sex slaves and the use of  females from conquered peoples for sex a perfectly acceptable thing.

"And all married women are forbidden unto you save those captives whom your right hand possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. (Muhammad Pickthall's English translation of the Quran)."

Note that the fact that these women may be married has no bearing on the Muslims. If they are taken in war then they are fair game. The link has many more quotes, by the way.

Leftist apologists for Islam will be quick to point out that other cultures did the same thing. Well, that was a long time ago for other cultures. The last time that slavery in Western Culture existed was before 1865, Europe having abolished it earlier. The closest parallel to a European people taking slaves of their nearby enemies in the same manner as the Koran (Written in the 7th century AD and still in force today), directs and allows for Muslims, can be found in the Iliad, which records events before 1200BC. Before the Age of colonization, Medieval Europe had virtually eliminated slavery by the the beginning of the 11th Century AD. Note also that slavery, although finally officially dropped by the last nation to allow it, Mauritania, is still practiced in this and other nations. They just call it different things.

One thing, among many, that Western students have had withheld from them, is the Islamic custom of three days of pillage following the successful conquest of a city. Islam provides this tradition for the weary and exhausted fighters in the service of Allah. Not that the Islamic conquests or their rule is presented in schools in anything other than good terms in the first place, indeed, the Christian Kingdoms of Spain are depicted in a bad light for daring to retake their land in the Reconquista. The customary three days of pillage, though, is a really juicy detail about which our children are not told. They may learn about the Ottoman Empire, and in doing so the fall of Constantinople must be briefly covered, but the atrocities suffered by its inhabitants in 1453 AD* will never be made known. Leftists, despising free nations or peoples, go to great lengths to extol the virtues of the Ottomans and their Empire. It is held up as a shining example of tolerant rule of many different peoples. They ignore the systematic taking of Christian boys to be raised as Muslim slave-soldiers (Janissaries) and Christian girls for the harems. They also ignore what happened once the defense of the city collapsed and Muslim soldiers burst into the city founded by Constantine over a thousand years earlier:

(*That's what happens when no proofreader is around. I never caught my typo. 1053, which was first typed into that spot, also happens to be a year that had importance for both the Eastern and Western Churches- the excommunicated each other. I was re-reading the post and realized that typed in a year for the Fall of Constantinople was 400 years off.)

"Commencing the last assault Sultan Mehmed II promised his troops three days of unbridled pillage of the city. Having stormed into Constantinople the Osmanli Turks used every moment to satisfy their instincts. In the rage of the battle with taking no notice of people they slaughtered everyone they met, and blood ran in torrents in the streets. The sackage broke out: the Turks rushed to the Palace of Blachernae and hastily took all the valuable assets out. Someone ran to Chora Churches and brought the precious shrine – the icon of Virgin Hodegetria, it was said to have been painted by Luke the Evangelist. The Turks ripped the riza off and cut the icon into four pieces[1]. They dragged praying women and children by hair out of the churches and beslaved them. They raped nuns and murdered men on the spot. "

"As soon as the Turks broke into the city they began to seize and enslave anyone who came their way. Anyone who resisted was slaughtered by the edge of the sword, and heaps of bodies covered the ground. “There were unprecedented events: all sorts of lamentations, countless rows of slaves consisting of noble ladies, virgins and nuns, who were being dragged by the Turks.46 In his zeal for Allah, Mehmet had ordered that the city, since it had resisted, be looted for the traditional three days according to Islamic law. But before the first day was up the Sultan brought in his police and put an end to the looting. The loss of the city for the Greeks meant not only an end of empire, but it also marked the start of almost four hundred years of captivity. For Mehmet it was the beginning of Ottoman rule, which would last until the 19th century. Under the rule of future Sultans the Ottoman Empire would continue conquering Christian lands, right up to the gates of Vienna in Austria. "

Note that in this case the three days were reduced to one.

My personal belief is that, far from being an issue of Muslim men not knowing how to control themselves among women who dress in a Western manner, as is advanced by Muslim apologists and Leftist Feminists*, the attitude of these attackers is fully in accordance with the concept of Jihad. The opportunity for booty in the conquest conquest of non-Muslim nations has been an integral part of Islamic warfare since its inception. Below is a quote that illustrates that this was no distortion of Islamic though but was encouraged by Mohamed himself:

"Amr's great distinction is that he was made military commander direct by the Prophet. In appointing him Mohammed said, "I am sending you forth as commander of a troop. May God keep you safe and give you much booty." When Amr answered, "I did not become a Muslim for the sake of wealth, but for the sake of submission to God," the Prophet rejoined, "Honest wealth is good for an honest man"-- a maxim which Amr doubtless remembered.... (page 202)" (Sources below)"honest+wealth+is+good+for+an+honest+man"&source=bl&ots=K8EneSVPgf&sig=PWgW12GwsUOuEVlIpbXIfwjMc

*"When University of Oslo Professor Unni Wikan reported a few daysbefore 9/11 that 65% of rapes in Norway were committed by Muslim men, she saw fit to add that“Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for theserapes” because Muslim men found Western dress too provocative to stand:" (Source Below)

The above quote by Ms. Wikan, a Leftist University professor in Norway, has got to be the worst piece of garbage that I have ever known to be spewed from any person's mouth. It is noteworthy that the greatest enemies of Ethnic Norwegian (And often those of other nations) women are Leftists of their own ethnic group.

The attitude of plunder has never left Islamic thought. The seizure of property, and especially the women, of conquered non-Muslim enemies still motivates the Muslim mind. I submit that, as much of the Muslim population of Europe has made no secret that they have every intention of eventually taking control of Europe and instituting what Jewish writer Bat Ye'or refers to as Eurabia, a significant portion of Muslim men must feel as if they are in the middle of the conquest right now. If that is the case, then they would likely reason that they are currently in the process of an extended version of the three days of pillage. Robberies, rapes, and other violent crimes against Ethnic Europeans are increasing. The police of these nations feel as if they are held back from doing their jobs, and it does not help when ethnic European men, probably due to concerns about being arrested themselves, fail to step up and defend their women:

"30 guests in a Swedish public bath watched as a 17-year-old girl was raped recently, and nobody did anything. The girl was first approached by 16-year-old boy. He and his friends followed her as she walked away to the grotto, and inside the grotto he got her blocked in the corner, ripped off her bikini and raped her, while his friend held her firm." (Source below)

....and it is beginning in the US:

I know that I have beaten this subject to death, but few will ever become aware of what is going on if the truth is not told. Last is long list of quotes concerning Muslim attitudes towards rape:

From the link below. All Italics and bolding are mine.

It is not as wrong raping a Swedish girl as raping an Arab girl,” says Hamid[link is in Swedish]. “The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably fucked before, anyway. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her, being raped is a source of shame. It is important that she retains her virginity until she marries.” It was no coincidence that it was a Swedish girl that was gang raped in Rissne – this becomes obvious from the discussion with Ali, Hamid, Abdallah and Richard. All four have disparaging views on Swedish girls, and think this attitude is common among young men with immigrant background. “It is far too easy to get a Swedish whore…… girl, I mean;” says Hamid, and laughs over his own choice of words. “Many immigrant boys have Swedish girlfriends when they are teenagers. But when they get married, they get a proper woman from their own culture who has never been with a boy. That’s what I am going to do. I don’t have too much respect for Swedish girls. I guess you can say they get fucked to pieces.”

The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations are so extremely high that it is difficult to view them only as random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his slave girls/concubines. This is perfectly allowed, both in the sunna and in the Koran. If you postulate that many of the Muslims in Europe view themselves as a conquering army and that European women are simply war booty, it all makes perfect sense and is in full accordance with Islamic law. Western women are not so much regarded by most Muslims as individuals, but as "their women," the women who "belong" to hostile Infidels. They are booty, to be taken, just as the land of the Infidels someday will drop, it is believed, into Muslim hands. This is not mere crime, but ideologically-justified crime or rather, in Muslim eyes, attacks on Infidels scarcely qualify as crime. Western women are cheap and offensive. We Muslims are here, here to stay, and we have a right to take advantage of this situation. It is our view of the matter that should prevail. Western goods, like the land on which we now live, belong to Allah and to the best of men -- his Believers. Western women, too, essentially belong to us -- our future booty. No wonder there is a deep and increasing suspicion against Muslims in the Swedish and European public. 

French filmmaker Pierre Rehov states that: “A friend of mine is a retired chief of police, who used to be in charge of the security of a major city in the south of France. He reported to me that his men had to face an average of 10 rapes a week, 80% made by Muslim young men. 30% being what we call, in French, a ‘tournante,’ meaning that the victim is being raped by an entire gang, one after the other, often during an entire night. He was astonished that, in most cases, the parents not only would back up their rapist children, but also would not even understand why they would be arrested. There is an instant shift in the notion of good and evil as a major component of culture. The only evil those parents would see, genuinely, is the temptation that the male children had to face. Since in most cases the victims were not Muslims, the parents’ answer and rejection was even more genuine: how could their boys be guilty of anything, when normally answering to a provocation by occidental women, known for their unacceptable behavior?”

Sheik Taj Din al-Hilaly, who called himself the Grand Mufti of Australia and New Zealand, in a sermon compared unveiled women to uncovered meat: “If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park, or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, then whose fault will it be, the cats, or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the disaster. If the meat was covered the cats wouldn’t roam around it.” Abduljalil Sajid of the Muslim Council of Britain defended Hilaly as “a great scholar.”

Shahid Mehdi, an Islamic mufti in Copenhagen, Denmark, stated in 2005 in a televised interview that women who do not wear headscarves are “asking for rape,” so Hilaly is not an isolated case. According to Tanveer Ahmed, a Sydney-based psychiatrist, the attitude “comes from households, where young Muslims get the message that white girls are different, and that women in general are a corrupting influence.” There have been several brutal gang rapes of white women by Muslim immigrant men in Australia.

What makes this even more absurd is that in Norway, as throughout the Western world, white-on-non-white violence is exceedingly rare. The vast majority of racism and racist violence comes from non-whites against whites, or between different groups of non-whites. In Oslo, young girls are raped; schoolchildren are threatened with death, robbed and assaulted. The police have warned against “an alarming rise in street violence” in urban areas across the country. This is directly caused by mass immigration, which is nevertheless still championed by the very same media who attacked these two ambulance drivers.

For instance, a 17-year-old Somalian was convicted of the rape of a young girl in Oslo. The court stated that the rape was unusually brutal and lasted for several hours. The man choked the girl for so long that the medical doctor who examined her said that she could have died. The girl suffers from severe psychological problems in the aftermath of the attack. The African youth was sentenced to four and half years in prison. This sentence included another rape, where his Norwegian-Moroccan friend raped a 13-year-old girl whilst the Somalian helped to threaten her and keep guard. She has naturally been traumatized from the incident."

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Chinese Buying US/Canada Food Resources

We have come to regurgitate whatever the establishment tells us to believe:

-"We can't deport all the illegal aliens that are in the US" (Has anyone told us why exactly it is that we can't?)

-"Democracies are there to help the people" (Democracies or Republics are instituted to protect Life, Liberty and Property - not to just be naively trusted to function properly forever)

I always loved this one;

-"Well, we want the Chinese to be as prosperous as we are. That way, they will soon start buy our products"

In responses to the latter, my questions were simply "Do we? and "Will they?".

The people have come to parrot whatever position they are told in the right one. It seemed that hardly anyone wondered if the Chinese would be willing to just start spending their money to buy products that were manufactured in the US. OK, maybe a few luxury items for the rich, but the Han do not operate with the understanding that every business decision should be a win-win, with both sides getting a comparable level of benefit.*

*From Montesquieu's The Spirit of the Laws:

"It is very remarkable that the Chinese, whose lives are guided by rites, are nevertheless the greatest cheats upon earth.....He who buys of them ought to carry his own weights, every merchant [Of theirs] having three sorts, the one heavy for buying, another light for selling, and another of the true standard for those who are upon their guard....[The Climate] that has given to the Chinese an inconceivable greediness for gain China they are suffered to deceive"

It does turn out, however, that the Chinese are in fact eager to buy some stuff from Americans and Canadians. Brazil and Australia are also in their sights.

What they are buying is the food supply of Western nations.

First link-

"With too few farms in China to feed a burgeoning population, Chinese immigrants have started buying up agricultural lands in Canada and shipping produce to Asia.

But with new investment comes fears that a generation of young Canadian would-be farmers are being squeezed out of the market by newcomers that some suspect are being bankrolled by the government in Beijing.

In Saskatchewan province, home to 45 percent of all arable land in Canada, the price of farmland has risen an average of 10 percent in the last year, and as much as 50 percent over three years in areas where Chinese immigrants have settled, according to farmer Ian Hudson, who lives near the village of Ogema.

Second link-

"In what could be the largest takeover of a U.S. company by a Chinese company, Chinese meat processor Shuanghui International Holdings has agreed to acquire No. 1 pork producer Smithfield Foods for $4.7 billion.

Smithfield shareholders will receive $34 a share under the deal, a 31% premium over Smithfield's closing stock price of $25.97 on Tuesday. Smithfield shares closed up 28% Wednesday at $33.35.

The companies put the deal's total value at about $7.1 billion, including debt.

Smithfield is the world's largest pork processor and hog producer. It sells packaged products under popular brands such as Farmland, Armour, Cook's and Smithfield."

Third link-
"On a sunny March afternoon, 11 Chinese executives armed with digital cameras and iPads got out of a van on Brazil’s highway BR-163 to photograph soybean-loaded trucks headed to export terminals.

Dressed in jeans and boots, the officials from five state-owned companies that imported 40 percent of China’s soybeans last year had traveled six hours to see the oilseed being moved from farms to ports during a tour organized by Rabobank Groep.

They’re part of a growing contingent scouring the world for farm assets or food technologies that can be brought to the world’s most-populous nation.

China is headed to spend a record this year on food assets and farms after a $32.7 billion splurge in the past five years and just $4.2 billion in the prior half-decade, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

The drive for assets from Brazil to the United States and Australia has ignited concern by lawmakers that has only been heightened by Shuanghui International Holdings’ $4.7 billion deal to buy Smithfield"

Here we are. Our taste for cheap manufactured goods, the Chinese proclivity (Assisted by the failure of our governments to protect our property) to steal our technology on which immeasurable work-hours and money has been spent, and our failure to stop our government from turning us into foreign debt-slaves of the Chinese, has produced its first harvest - and what has been reaped is being sent back to China.

Why are we allowing the colonization of the West? 

The Chinese have a lot of money, a lot of people, and they don't want to drop too heavy a hand on their Asian neighbors - yet. For now, they are using our selfishness and blind trust of our governments against us.

Our farmland will increase in price, making it harder for young people to buy farms and easier for big corporations; we are approaching the era of the latifundia. The independent farmer will be gone, replaced by massive company-owned farms worked by immigrant labor.

Our food prices will rise as more food grown and raised in the US and Canada gets sent to China.

The threat of Japanese cash was never this bad.

Manly people are not aware of this, but the Red Dawn remake that finally made it to the theaters in November of 2010 had undergone marked changes in the plot. It was not originally the North Koreans who invaded the US - it was China. Vigorous protests by the Chinese government, along with the threat to prohibit the showing of the movie in China and whatever revenues that would bring, were sufficient for the company to make major changes to the work. I personally suspect that Quislings in our own government also did the bidding of Beijing and influenced the producers. Perhaps the Chinese have not ruled out the possibility of forcibly entering a severely weakened US to protect their "assets" and to collect the rest of what we owe from all the treasury bonds Obama begged them to buy.

[Added 6/23/13- I should have noted that the Red Dawn remake also had the bizarre twist of the Russians playing a part in the invasion of the US. For crying out loud; the Great Game is long over, as is the Cold War. Why do we still think that the Russians want to come all the way over here to help take us over? If anything, the expansion (Rather than a reduction) of NATO to include former Warsaw Pact nations probably have the Russians fearing what we may want to do. We were rightfully made to look like fools when the a tiny fragment of the Russian army rolled over Georgian forces trying to control Russian-majority territories  I wonder if there is some sub-strategy going on that requires that we continue to force Russia to think of the US as an enemy. It is as if the US is being set up for a future of foreign domination at the hands of another country that felt that it had no option other than to eliminate us as a potential rival]

A couple of years ago in the US, a traveling museum exhibit of archaeological finds, including the famous Tarim Basin mummies, was shot to pieces due to threats from Beijing. The mummies are believed by many to be those of the Tocharians (Or Tokarians), an Indo-European speaking people who (Very early) migrated Eastward and survived as a distinct people with their own language until around the 7th-8th centuries AD. The Chinese were not about letting evidence of a people closely related to Western and Eastern Europeans, with fabrics having the style and look of something out of the Scottish Highlands, being shown to have existed in what is now modern China for thousands of years. Genetic data from these mummies has shown that their Y-DNA matches that which is associated with many Indo-Europeans. Even ancient Chinese artwork depicts these people, with European features and red/light brown/blond hair, but this is not to be discussed, nor will the West be allowed to make this fact known. The Chinese don't like the fact that this event occurred, so it will be kept under wraps.

At what point will enough be enough for you?

Friday, June 21, 2013

Suing UK Authorities For Sex Gang Nonfeasance

No time to write a post of normal length tonight as I had to attend a wake, but this is a good subject.

I do not call this misfeasance as the prefix "mis"can have connotations of messing up. Malfeasance means that they acted wrongly. This is even worse - they did nothing.

When the Catholic Church, especially that of the US, started getting nailed with massive civil penalties for failing to report knowledge of sex crimes and covering for the criminals in the clerical ranks, the Bishops finally got the message - Do your job or be wrecked financially.

"Gavin Boby, whose Law and Freedom Foundation gained attention for its “mosque-busting” efforts, has now launched a new initiative called “Never Shall Be Slaves”. His aim is to reach out to the young native British girls whose lives were ruined after they were turned into sex slaves by Muslim “grooming and pimping” gangs. He is offering them pro bono help in obtaining financial redress from the authorities who neglected to protect them:"

-The link at top has a video of Mr. Boby describing his work.

British authorities from all sorts of agencies, including the police, knew for many years* that gangs of predators, almost solely Muslim immigrants, were engaging in the wholesale rape of indigenous British girls. The Left and the complicit moderate governmental officials in the UK basically made these animals into protected peoples - off limits to any real investigations or  prosecutions. 

I hope that those who knew and did nothing are held to be personally liable for their failure to act, even if they were doing so under orders from their superiors (Which is certainly true for some of them). No job or career is worth letting the innocent suffer, the guilty go unpunished, or the ruin of your your reputation.

Make them truly regret ignoring their duty.